Creativity Supportive Ecosystems: A Framework for Understanding Function and Disruption in Online Art Worlds
Shm Garanganao Almeda, Joy O. Kim, Bjoern Hartmann
Abstract
The online art world is a double-edged sword: the Internet’s vibrant culture of open, cooperative art-sharing also attracts non-consensual reuse and appropriation. Artists continually navigate supportive and challenging interactions on social platforms, including community-shifting disruptions; the reuse of creative work for training generative AI is only the latest such disruption. Research into creativity support tools (CSTs) often centers artifact-making, leaving the HCI community with few strategies to understand the downstream impacts CSTs can make on artifact-sharing. Seeking a framework that captures this, we develop the creativity supportive ecosystem through interviews with 20 online artists, and 8 data “stewards” with experience reusing creative data for training GenAI. We use the CSE to describe how creative communities perceive and respond to disruption, identifying opportunities to empower artists in their collective negotiations with disruptive technologies like GenAI: by centering artists as producers of value, identifying creative and alternative data practices, and empowering inter-community flexibility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b18222a-3e26-4619-8e73-e3a67211bc85Builds on11
- Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset DevelopmentMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Alex Hanna, Emily DentonCSCW 2021 · 169 citations
- Nightshade: Prompt-Specific Poisoning Attacks on Text-to-Image Generative ModelsShawn Shan, Wenxin Ding, Josephine Passananti, Stanley Wu et al.S&P 2024 · 102 citations
- "At the End of the Day Facebook Does What ItWants": How Users Experience Contesting Algorithmic Content ModerationKristen Vaccaro, Christian Sandvig, Karrie KarahaliosCSCW 2020 · 79 citations
- Beyond the Artifact: Power as a Lens for Creativity Support ToolsJingyi Li, Eric Rawn, Jacob Ritchie, Jasper Tran O'Leary et al.UIST 2023 · 79 citations
- Evaluating Data Attribution for Text-to-Image ModelsSheng-Yu Wang, Alexei A. Efros, Jun-Yan Zhu, Richard ZhangICCV 2023 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Exploring the Impact of AI-powered Creativity Support Tools on Professional Creative WorkflowsCaterina Moruzzi, Charlotte Bird, Laura Mariah HermanCSCW 2026
- "I Just Don't Want My Work Being Fed Into The AI Blender": Queer Artists on Refusing and Resisting Generative AIJordan Taylor, Joel Mire, Alicia DeVrio, Maarten Sap et al.CSCW 2026
- Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and StrategiesYuan Sun, Eunchae Jang, Fenglong Ma, Ting WangCHI 2024 · 63 citations
- Designing Privacy Choice in Generative AI Chatbot EcosystemsLanjing Liu, Xinran Adeline Li, Allen Yilun Lin, Yaxing YaoCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Generative AI in Children's Creative Collaboration: Impact, Perception, and Design GuidelinesDaeun Yoo, Michele Newman, Caroline Pitt, Kevin Huu Vo et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
