Regularized Latent Dynamics Prediction is a Strong Baseline For Behavioral Foundation Models
Pranaya Jajoo, Harshit Sikchi, Siddhant Agarwal, Amy Zhang, Scott Niekum, Martha White
Abstract
Behavioral Foundation Models (BFMs) have been recently successful in producing agents with the capabilities to adapt to any unknown reward or task. In reality, these methods are only able to produce near-optimal policies for the reward functions that are in the span of some pre-existing state features. Naturally, their efficiency relies heavily on the choice of state features that they use. As a result, these BFMs have used a wide variety of complex objectives, often sensitive to environment coverage, to train task spanning features with different inductive properties. With this work, our aim is to examine the question: are these complex representation learning objectives necessary for zero-shot RL? Specifically, we revisit the objective of self-supervised next-state prediction in latent space for state feature learning, but observe that such an objective alone is prone to increasing state-feature similarity, and subsequently reducing span of reward functions that we can represent optimal policies for. We propose an approach, RLDP, that adds a simple regularization to maintain feature diversity and can match or surpass state-of-the-art complex representation learning methods for zero-shot RL. Furthermore, we demonstrate the prior approaches diverge in low-coverage scenarios where RLDP still succeeds.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9afd79d2-12ed-48c6-a049-e445ea1ac8d6Cited by top-tier papers4
- TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement LearningMarco Bagatella, Matteo Pirotta, Ahmed Touati, Alessandro Lazaric et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- Optimistic Task Inference for Behavior Foundation ModelsThomas Rupf, Marco Bagatella, Marin Vlastelica, Andreas KrauseICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Laplacian Representations for Decision-Time PlanningDikshant Shehmar, Matthew Schlegel, Matthew Taylor, Marlos C. MachadoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement LearningJun-Jie Yang, Chia-Heng Hsu, Kui-Yuan Chen, Ping-Chun HsiehICML 2026
Builds on20
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Zero-Shot Adaptation of Behavioral Foundation Models to Unseen DynamicsMaksim Bobrin, Ilya Zisman, Alexander Nikulin, Vladislav Kurenkov et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Distributional Successor Features Enable Zero-Shot Policy OptimizationChuning Zhu, Xinqi Wang, Tyler Han, Simon S. Du et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Foundation Policies with Hilbert RepresentationsSeohong Park, Tobias Kreiman, Sergey LevineICML 2024 · 72 citations
- Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?Ahmed Touati, Jérémy Rapin, Yann OllivierICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Zero-Shot Whole-Body Humanoid Control via Behavioral Foundation ModelsAndrea Tirinzoni, Ahmed Touati, Jesse Farebrother, Mateusz Guzek et al.ICLR 2025
