Static Algorithm, Evolving Epidemic: Understanding the Potential of Human-AI Risk Assessment to Support Regional Overdose Prevention
Venkatesh Sivaraman, Yejun Kwak, Courtney Kuza, Qingnan Yang, Kayleigh Adamson, Katie Suda, Lu Tang, Walid Gellad, Adam Perer
Abstract
Drug overdose deaths, including those due to prescription opioids, represent a critical public health issue in the United States and worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been developed and deployed to help prescribers assess a patient's risk for overdose-related death, but it is unknown whether public health experts can leverage similar predictions to make local resource allocation decisions more effectively. In this work, we evaluated how AI-based overdose risk assessment could be used to inform local public health decisions using a working prototype system. Experts from three health departments, of varying locations and sizes with respect to staff and population served, were receptive to the potential benefits of algorithmic risk prediction and of using AI-augmented visualization to connect across data sources. However, they also expressed concerns about whether the risk prediction model's formulation and underlying data would match the state of the overdose epidemic as it evolved in their specific locations. Our findings extend those of other studies on algorithmic systems in the public sector, and they present opportunities for future human-AI collaborative tools to support decision-making in local, time-varying contexts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on22
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic RetinopathyEmma Beede, Elizabeth Elliott Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko et al.CHI 2020 · 589 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision SupportAnna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton et al.CHI 2022 · 137 citations
- Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health CareVenkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn et al.CHI 2023 · 126 citations
Related papers
- Healthcare AI Treatment Decision Support: Design Principles to Enhance Clinician Adoption and TrustEleanor R. Burgess, Ivana Jankovic, Melissa Austin, Nancy Cai et al.CHI 2023 · 65 citations
- Disentangled Dynamic Heterogeneous Graph Learning for Opioid Overdose PredictionQianlong Wen, Zhongyu Ouyang, Jianfei Zhang, Yiyue Qian et al.KDD 2022 · 17 citations
- The Datafication of Care in Public Homelessness ServicesErina Seh-Young Moon, Devansh Saxena, Dipto Das, Shion GuhaCHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for JudgmentLeon Fröhling, Alessandro Giaconia, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- "What is Your Envisioned Future?": Toward Human-AI Enrichment in Data Work of Asthma CareZhaoyuan Su, Lu He, Sunit P. Jariwala, Kai Zheng et al.CSCW 2022 · 26 citations
