MoralDial: A Framework to Train and Evaluate Moral Dialogue Systems via Moral Discussions
Hao Sun, Zhexin Zhang, Fei Mi, Yasheng Wang, Wei Liu, Jianwei Cui, Bin Wang, Qun Liu, Minlie Huang
Abstract
Morality in dialogue systems has raised great attention in research recently. A moral dialogue system aligned with users' values could enhance conversation engagement and user connections. In this paper, we propose a framework, MORALDIAL to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems. In our framework, we first explore the communication mechanisms of morality and resolve expressed morality into three parts, which indicate the roadmap for building a moral dialogue system. Based on that, we design a simple yet effective method: constructing moral discussions between simulated specific users and the dialogue system. The constructed discussions consist of expressing, explaining, revising, and inferring moral views in dialogue exchanges, which makes conversational models learn morality well in a natural manner. Furthermore, we propose a novel evaluation method under the framework. We evaluate the multiple aspects of morality by judging the relation between dialogue responses and human values in discussions, where the multifaceted nature of morality is particularly considered. Automatic and manual experiments demonstrate that our framework is promising to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- More of the Same: Persistent Representational Harms Under Increased RepresentationJennifer Mickel, Maria De-Arteaga, Liu Leqi, Kevin TianNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- From Tools to Teammates: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-Session Coding InteractionsNathanaël Carraz Rakotonirina, Mohammed Hamdy, Jon Ander Campos, Lucas Weber et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
- VIVA: A Benchmark for Vision-Grounded Decision-Making with Human ValuesZhe Hu, Yixiao Ren, Jing Li, Yu YinEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Aligning AI With Shared Human ValuesDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch et al.ICLR 2021 · 878 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
Related papers
- EthicMind: A Risk-Aware Framework for Ethical-Emotional Alignment in Multi-Turn DialogueJiawen Deng, Wei Li, Wentao Zhang, Ziyun Jiao et al.ACL 2026
- The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue SystemsCaleb Ziems, Jane A. Yu, Yi-Chia Wang, Alon Y. Halevy et al.ACL 2022 · 127 citations
- The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed ArgumentsMilad Alshomary, Roxanne El Baff, Timon Gurcke, Henning WachsmuthACL 2022
- Improving Multi-label Malevolence Detection in Dialogues through Multi-faceted Label Correlation EnhancementYangjun Zhang, Pengjie Ren, Wentao Deng, Zhumin Chen et al.ACL 2022 · 10 citations
- MoReBench: Evaluating Procedural and Pluralistic Moral Reasoning in Language Models, More than OutcomesYu Ying Chiu, Michael S. Lee, Rachel Calcott, Brandon Handoko et al.ICLR 2026 · 23 citations
