HoneypotNet: Backdoor Attacks Against Model Extraction
Yixu Wang, Tianle Gu, Yan Teng, Yingchun Wang, Xingjun Ma
Abstract
Model extraction attacks are one type of inference-time attacks that approximate the functionality and performance of a black-box victim model by launching a certain number of queries to the model and then leveraging the model's predictions to train a substitute model. These attacks pose severe security threats to production models and MLaaS platforms and could cause significant monetary losses to the model owners. A body of work has proposed to defend machine learning models against model extraction attacks, including both active defense methods that modify the model's outputs or increase the query overhead to avoid extraction and passive defense methods that detect malicious queries or leverage watermarks to perform post-verification. In this work, we introduce a new defense paradigm called attack as defense which modifies the model's output to be poisonous such that any malicious users that attempt to use the output to train a substitute model will be poisoned. To this end, we propose a novel lightweight backdoor attack method dubbed HoneypotNet that replaces the classification layer of the victim model with a honeypot layer and then fine-tunes the honeypot layer with a shadow model (to simulate model extraction) via bi-level optimization to modify its output to be poisonous while remaining the original performance. We empirically demonstrate on four commonly used benchmark datasets that Hon-eypotNet can inject backdoors into substitute models with a high success rate. The injected backdoor not only facilitates ownership verification but also disrupts the functionality of substitute models, serving as a significant deterrent to model extraction attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9aa4b94e-536f-4cc0-83f4-5572675813caCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- ABS: Scanning Neural Networks for Back-doors by Artificial Brain StimulationYingqi Liu, Wen-Chuan Lee, Guanhong Tao, Shiqing Ma et al.CCS 2019 · 531 citations
- Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model ExtractionHengrui Jia, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Varun Chandrasekaran, Nicolas PapernotUSENIX Security 2021 · 287 citations
- Universal Adversarial TrainingAli Shafahi, Mahyar Najibi, Zheng Xu, John P. Dickerson et al.AAAI 2020 · 210 citations
- ActiveThief: Model Extraction Using Active Learning and Unannotated Public DataSoham Pal, Yash Gupta, Aditya Shukla, Aditya Kanade et al.AAAI 2020 · 164 citations
Related papers
- Need for Speed: Taming Backdoor Attacks with Speed and PrecisionZhuo Ma, Yilong Yang, Yang Liu, Tong Yang et al.S&P 2024 · 6 citations
- DEFEAT: Deep Hidden Feature Backdoor Attacks by Imperceptible Perturbation and Latent Representation ConstraintsZhendong Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Yuexin Xuan, Ye Dong et al.CVPR 2022 · 72 citations
- MEA-Defender: A Robust Watermark against Model Extraction AttackPeizhuo Lv, Hualong Ma, Kai Chen, Jiachen Zhou et al.S&P 2024 · 22 citations
- BaDExpert: Extracting Backdoor Functionality for Accurate Backdoor Input DetectionTinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Ping He, Yiming Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 20 citations
- Mitigating Backdoor Attack by Injecting Proactive Defensive BackdoorShaokui Wei, Hongyuan Zha, Baoyuan WuNeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
