"Math is a pain!": Understanding challenges and needs of the Machine Learning community on Stack Overflow
Zihan Fang, Yu Huang
Abstract
Stack Overflow (SO) is a widely recognized online question-and-answer platform for programming, which has also fostered a substantial community dedicated to machine learning (ML), providing a space for both novices and experts to exchange ideas and find solutions to ML-related problems. However, as a relative minority of this online programming platform, research has demonstrated lower engagement in the ML community, but it remains largely unexplored to understand what hinders the engagement and contribution from ML users' perspectives. This paper presents an empirical study based on 22 hours of semi-structured interviews and 131 survey responses with users on SO and reveals the key factors that may lead to the lower response rate and extended waiting time for ML questions on SO, which includes the unique quality requirement for posting ML questions, the discrepancy between time invested and benefits gained, the dispersed nature of the ML community across various platforms and the desired improvement for SO. Moreover, the qualitative study reveals a declining friendliness in SO's culture over time; the subsequent quantitative study corroborates that newcomers frequently encounter stress when posting and answering ML questions, even though this stress diminishes with increased experience. Additionally, we also explored the potential influence of generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) on online question-and-answer platforms, specifically focusing on ML Q&A. We hope the results of this study can pave the way for enhancing the experience of ML users on online platforms, ultimately facilitating improved knowledge exchange and collaboration within the ML domain.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 9a53e79d-b0e2-4821-a39f-a25cde8e0778Related papers
- 'Always Nice and Confident, Sometimes Wrong': Developer's Experiences Engaging Generative AI Chatbots Versus Human-Powered Q&A PlatformsJiachen Li, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Varun Mishra, Jonathan BellCSCW 2025 · 8 citations
- The Generative AI Divide: A Descriptive Analysis of Heterogeneous Adaptation Among Knowledge ContributorsJaeyoon Song, Arman Vossoughi, Hongzun Zhang, Dokyun LeeCSCW 2026
- API recommendation for machine learning libraries: how far are we?Moshi Wei, Yuchao Huang, Junjie Wang, Jiho Shin et al.FSE 2022 · 6 citations
- Is Stack Overflow Obsolete? An Empirical Study of the Characteristics of ChatGPT Answers to Stack Overflow QuestionsSamia Kabir, David N. Udo-Imeh, Bonan Kou, Tianyi ZhangCHI 2024 · 149 citations
- Braess's Paradox of Generative AIBoaz Taitler, Omer Ben-PoratAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
