Lune

ICLR2023Top-tier venue

Policy-Based Self-Competition for Planning Problems

Jonathan Pirnay, Quirin Göttl, Jakob Burger, Dominik Gerhard Grimm

Abstract

AlphaZero-type algorithms may stop improving on single-player tasks in case the value network guiding the tree search is unable to approximate the outcome of an episode sufficiently well. One technique to address this problem is transforming the single-player task through self-competition. The main idea is to compute a scalar baseline from the agent's historical performances and to reshape an episode's reward into a binary output, indicating whether the baseline has been exceeded or not. However, this baseline only carries limited information for the agent about strategies how to improve. We leverage the idea of self-competition and directly incorporate a historical policy into the planning process instead of its scalar performance. Based on the recently introduced Gumbel AlphaZero (GAZ), we propose our algorithm GAZ 'Play-to-Plan' (GAZ PTP), in which the agent learns to find strong trajectories by planning against possible strategies of its past self. We show the effectiveness of our approach in two well-known combinatorial optimization problems, the Traveling Salesman Problem and the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem. With only half of the simulation budget for search, GAZ PTP consistently outperforms all selected single-player variants of GAZ.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on6

  1. Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
  2. POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement LearningYeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
  3. Learning to Dispatch for Job Shop Scheduling via Deep Reinforcement LearningCong Zhang, Wen Song, Zhiguang Cao, Jie Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 497 citations
  4. Learning and Planning in Complex Action SpacesThomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Mohammadamin Barekatain et al.ICML 2021 · 99 citations
  5. Policy improvement by planning with GumbelIvo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David SilverICLR 2022 · 84 citations

Related papers

  1. Multiagent Gumbel MuZero: Efficient Planning in Combinatorial Action SpacesXiaotian Hao, Jianye Hao, Chenjun Xiao, Kai Li et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
  2. Goal-Directed Planning via Hindsight Experience ReplayLorenzo Moro, Amarildo Likmeta, Enrico Prati, Marcello RestelliICLR 2022 · 14 citations
  3. Solving General-Utility Markov Decision Processes in the Single-Trial Regime with Online PlanningPedro Santos, Alberto Sardinha, Francisco S. MeloICLR 2026 · 2 citations
  4. Self-Labeling the Job Shop Scheduling ProblemAndrea Corsini, Angelo Porrello, Simone Calderara, Mauro Dell'AmicoNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
  5. Accelerating Monte Carlo Tree Search with Probability Tree State AbstractionYangqing Fu, Ming Sun, Buqing Nie, Yue GaoNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines