I know what you MEME! Understanding and Detecting Harmful Memes with Multimodal Large Language Models
Yong Zhuang, Keyan Guo, Juan Wang, Yiheng Jing, Xiaoyang Xu, Wenzhe Yi, Mengda Yang, Bo Zhao, Hongxin Hu
Abstract
—Memes have become a double-edged sword on social media platforms. On one hand, they facilitate the rapid dissemination of information and enhance communication. On the other hand, memes pose a risk of spreading harmful content under the guise of humor and virality. This duality highlights the need to develop effective moderation tools capable of identifying harmful memes. Current detection methods, however, face significant challenges in identifying harmful memes due to their inherent complexity. This complexity arises from the diverse forms of expression, intricate compositions, sophisticated propaganda techniques, and varied cultural contexts in which memes are created and circulated. These factors make it difficult for existing algorithms to distinguish between harmless and harmful content accurately. To understand and address these challenges, we first conduct a comprehensive study on harmful memes from two novel perspectives: visual arts and propaganda techniques . It aims to assess existing tools for detecting harmful memes and understand the complexities inherent in them. Our findings demonstrate that meme compositions and propaganda techniques can significantly diminish the effectiveness of current harmful meme detection methods. Inspired by our observations and understanding of harmful memes, we propose a novel framework called HM-G UARD for effective detection of harmful memes. HMG UARD utilizes adaptive prompting and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). HMG UARD has demonstrated remarkable performance on the public harmful meme dataset, achieving an accuracy of 0.92. Compared to the baseline, HMG UARD represents a substantial improvement, with accuracy exceeding the baselines by 15% to 79.17%
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
- The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal MemesDouwe Kiela, Hamed Firooz, Aravind Mohan, Vedanuj Goswami et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,022 citations
- Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiawei Chen, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le SunAAAI 2024 · 531 citations
Related papers
- MemeGuard: An LLM and VLM-based Framework for Advancing Content Moderation via Meme InterventionPrince Jha, Raghav Jain, Konika Mandal, Aman Chadha et al.ACL 2024 · 5 citations
- Read as You See: Guiding Unimodal LLMs for Low-Resource Explainable Harmful Meme DetectionFengjun Pan, Xiaobao Wu, Tho Quan, Anh Tuan LuuWWW 2026 · 2 citations
- SGoT-R1: Social Graph of Thought Reasoning-Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Model for Harmful Meme DetectionXiuxian Wang, Yuting Su, Wenhui Li, Xiaowen Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- AdamMeme: Adaptively Probe the Reasoning Capacity of Multimodal Large Language Models on HarmfulnessZixin Chen, Hongzhan Lin, Kaixin Li, Ziyang Luo et al.ACL 2025
- Detecting Propaganda Techniques in MemesDimitar Dimitrov, Bishr Bin Ali, Shaden Shaar, Firoj Alam et al.ACL 2021
