AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs
Xuanwen Ding, Chengjun Pan, Zejun Li, Jiwen Zhang, Siyuan Wang, Zhongyu Wei
Abstract
Evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is increasingly expensive, as the growing size and cross-modality complexity of benchmarks demand significant scoring efforts. To tackle with this difficulty, we introduce AutoJudger, an agent-driven framework for efficient and adaptive benchmarking of MLLMs that tackles this escalating cost. AutoJudger employs the Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate the question difficulty and an autonomous evaluation agent to dynamically select the most informative test questions based on the model's real-time performance. Specifically, AutoJudger incorporates two pivotal components: a semantic-aware retrieval mechanism to ensure that selected questions cover diverse and challenging scenarios across both vision and language modalities, and a dynamic memory that maintains contextual statistics of previously evaluated questions to guide coherent and globally informed question selection throughout the evaluation process. Extensive experiments on four representative multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that our adaptive framework dramatically reduces evaluation expenses, i.e. AutoJudger uses only 4% of the data to achieve over 90% ranking accuracy with the full benchmark evaluation on MMT-Bench.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 99b516ac-3d52-45d4-8b0e-07154d4e5892Cited by top-tier papers2
- MetaEval: Measuring the Discrimination of Benchmarks for Efficient LLM EvaluationZhuo Wang, Wen Wu, Guoqing Wang, Guangze Ye et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language ModelsMing Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on19
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- What matters when building vision-language models?Hugo Laurençon, Léo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, Victor SanhNeurIPS 2024 · 401 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response TheoryShunki Uebayashi, Kento Masui, Kyohei Atarashi, Han Bao et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language BenchmarkDongping Chen, Ruoxi Chen, Shilin Zhang, Yaochen Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 345 citations
- AtelierEval: Agentic Evaluation of Humans & LLMs as Text-to-Image PromptersHanjun Luo, Zhimu Huang, Sylvia Chung Yan Shan, Yiran Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- VideoJudge: Bootstrapping Enables Scalable Supervision of MLLM-as-a-Judge for Video UnderstandingAbdul Waheed, Zhen Wu, Dareen Safar Alharthi, Seungone Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model EvaluationYuhui Zhang, Yuchang Su, Yiming Liu, Xiaohan Wang et al.CVPR 2025
