AutoRAN: Automated Hijacking of Safety Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models
Jiacheng Liang, Tanqiu Jiang, Yuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Fenglong Ma, Ting Wang
Abstract
This paper presents AutoRAN 1 , the first framework to automate the hijacking of internal safety reasoning in large reasoning models (LRMs). At its core, AutoRAN pioneers an execution simulation paradigm that leverages a weaker but less-aligned model to simulate execution reasoning for initial hijacking attempts and iteratively refine attacks by exploiting reasoning patterns leaked through the target LRM's refusals. This approach steers the target model to bypass its own safety guardrails and elaborate on harmful instructions. We evaluate AutoRAN against state-of-the-art LRMs, including gpt-o3/o4-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash, across multiple benchmarks (AdvBench, Harm-Bench, and StrongReject). Results show that AutoRAN achieves approaching 100% success rate within one or a few turns, effectively neutralizing reasoning-based defenses even when evaluated by robustly aligned external models. This work reveals that the transparency of the reasoning process itself creates a critical and exploitable attack surface, highlighting the urgent need for new defenses that protect models' reasoning traces rather than merely their final outputs. The code for replicating Au-toRAN is available at: https://github.com/ JACKPURCELL/AutoRAN-public .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Reasoning as an Adaptive Defense for SafetyTaeyoun Kim, Fahim Tajwar, Aditi Raghunathan, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2025 · 24 citations
- Rethinking Jailbreak Detection of Large Vision Language Models with Representational Contrastive ScoringPeichun Hua, Hao Li, Shanghao Shi, Zhiyuan Yu et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
- ReasoningGuard: Safeguarding Large Reasoning Models with Inference-time Safety Aha MomentsYuquan Wang, Mi Zhang, Yining Wang, Geng Hong et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Reasoning as an Attack Surface: Adaptive Evolutionary CoT Jailbreaks for LLMsJianan Li, Simeng Qin, Jiapeng Chen, Lionel Z. Wang et al.ICML 2026
- Less Diverse, Less Safe: The Indirect But Pervasive Risk of Test-Time Scaling in Large Language ModelsShahriar Kabir Nahin, Hadi Askari, Muhao Chen, Anshuman ChhabraICML 2026
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
Related papers
- ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous ReasoningZhengyue Zhao, Yingzi Ma, Somesh Jha, Marco Pavone et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- AdvChain: Adversarial Chain-of-Thought Tuning for Robust Safety Alignment of Large Reasoning ModelsZihao Zhu, Xinyu Wu, Gehan Hu, Siwei Lyu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- More Thinking, Less Talking: Internalizing Deliberative Safety into LLM ParametersGuan Wang, Xuehai Tang, Biyu Zhou, Jizhong Han et al.ACL 2026
- SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early AlignmentWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Minsuk Kahng, Albert NoNeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- Reasoning-to-Defend: Safety-Aware Reasoning Can Defend Large Language Models from JailbreakingJunda Zhu, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
