Lune

EMNLP Findings2023

INVITE: a Testbed of Automatically Generated Invalid Questions to Evaluate Large Language Models for Hallucinations

Anil Ramakrishna, Rahul Gupta, Jens Lehmann, Morteza Ziyadi

Abstract

Recent advancements in Large language models (LLMs) have enabled them to hold free form conversations over multiple turns, but they exhibit a tendency to make unfounded and incorrect statements, commonly known as hallucinations. In particular, LLMs hallucinate frequently when given invalid questions, i.e. ones with incorrect assumptions. The most common approach to evaluate LLMs on hallucinations is to test them on Question Answering (QA) test sets such as TruthfulQA. However, LLMs are increasingly pretrained on massive text corpora scraped from the Internet, which may inevitably expose these test sets to the model during training, leading eventually to an overestimation of model performances on these test sets. In this work, we present an alternative framework to address this risk and to foster further research towards making LLMs robust against invalid questions. We name our framework INVITE: a testbed of automatically generated INValId questions to evaluaTE large language models for hallucinations. In each instantiation, our framework is set up to create a fresh batch of invalid questions by distorting valid facts in which subjects or objects are replaced by similar entities. We evaluate several state of the art LLMs against a testset generated by our framework and highlight its capacity to trigger hallucinations in these models.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

  1. An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLPPranav Narayanan Venkit, Tatiana Chakravorti, Vipul Gupta, Heidi Biggs et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
  2. Whispers that Shake Foundations: Analyzing and Mitigating False Premise Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsHongbang Yuan, Pengfei Cao, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
  3. FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"Yifei Ming, Senthil Purushwalkam, Shrey Pandit, Zixuan Ke et al.ICLR 2025

Builds on7

  1. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  2. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
  3. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
  4. Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations
  5. CodeT: Code Generation with Generated TestsBei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Anh Nguyen, Daoguang Zan et al.ICLR 2023 · 64 citations

Related papers

  1. Identifying and Answering Questions with False Assumptions: An Interpretable ApproachZijie Wang, Eduardo BlancoEMNLP 2025
  2. The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng et al.ACL 2024 · 49 citations
  3. A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination DetectionShiping Yang, Renliang Sun, Xiaojun WanEMNLP Findings 2023 · 25 citations
  4. Detecting and Reducing the Factual Hallucinations of Large Language Models with Metamorphic TestingWeibin Wu, Yuhang Cao, Ning Yi, Rongyi Ou et al.FSE 2025 · 5 citations
  5. Reference-free Hallucination Detection for Large Vision-Language ModelsQing Li, Jiahui Geng, Chenyang Lyu, Derui Zhu et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 16 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines