Lune

CCS2023Top-tier venue

Is Modeling Access Control Worth It?

David A. Basin, Juan Guarnizo, Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao, Martín Ochoa

2023Year
1Citations

Abstract

Implementing access control policies is an error-prone task that can have severe consequences for the security of software applications. Model-driven approaches have been proposed in the literature and associated tools have been developed with the goal of reducing the complexity of this task and helping developers to produce secure software efficiently. Nevertheless, there is a lack of empirical data supporting the advantages of model-driven security approaches over code-centric approaches, which are the de-facto industry standard for software development. In this work, we compare the result of implementing the same functional and security requirements by multiple developer groups in the context of a security engineering graduate course. We thereby obtain evidence on the security and efficiency of a tool-based modeldriven approach to security from the literature compared to a direct implementation in a well-known, modern web-development framework. For example, the projects using model-driven development pass up to 50% more security tests on average with less development effort. Also, we observe that models are twice as concise as manual implementations, which improves system maintainability. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → System modeling languages; • Security and privacy → Software security engineering; Access control.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 988a67e0-949a-4f5e-bada-6da1969728e1

Builds on3

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines