Posterior Sampling with Delayed Feedback for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation
Nikki Lijing Kuang, Ming Yin, Mengdi Wang, Yu-Xiang Wang, Yian Ma
Abstract
Recent studies in reinforcement learning (RL) have made significant progress by leveraging function approximation to alleviate the sample complexity hurdle for better performance. Despite the success, existing provably efficient algorithms typically rely on the accessibility of immediate feedback upon taking actions. The failure to account for the impact of delay in observations can significantly degrade the performance of real-world systems due to the regret blow-up. In this work, we tackle the challenge of delayed feedback in RL with linear function approximation by employing posterior sampling, which has been shown to empirically outperform the popular UCB algorithms in a wide range of regimes. We first introduce Delayed-PSVI, an optimistic value-based algorithm that effectively explores the value function space via noise perturbation with posterior sampling. We provide the first analysis for posterior sampling algorithms with delayed feedback in RL and show our algorithm achieves worst-case regret in the presence of unknown stochastic delays. Here is the expected delay. To further improve its computational efficiency and to expand its applicability in high-dimensional RL problems, we incorporate a gradient-based approximate sampling scheme via Langevin dynamics for Delayed-LPSVI, which maintains the same order-optimal regret guarantee with computational cost. Empirical evaluations are performed to demonstrate the statistical and computational efficacy of our algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Provable and Practical: Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning via Langevin Monte CarloHaque Ishfaq, Qingfeng Lan, Pan Xu, A. Rupam Mahmood et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- Randomized Exploration in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningHao-Lun Hsu, Weixin Wang, Miroslav Pajic, Pan XuNeurIPS 2024 · 25 citations
- Kernel-Based Function Approximation for Average Reward Reinforcement Learning: An Optimist No-Regret AlgorithmSattar Vakili, Julia OlkhovskayaNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Is O(log N) practical? Near-Equivalence Between Delay Robustness and Bounded Regret in Bandits and RLEnoch H. Kang, P. R. KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on34
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement LearningKevin Black, Michael Janner, Yilun Du, Ilya Kostrikov et al.ICLR 2024 · 816 citations
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted RegressionAlex Ayoub, Zeyu Jia, Csaba Szepesvári, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2020 · 324 citations
- Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret BoundLin Yang, Mengdi WangICML 2020 · 308 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy OptimizationQi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Chi Jin, Zhaoran WangICML 2020 · 304 citations
Related papers
- Minimax Optimal Strategy for Delayed Observations in Online Reinforcement LearningHarin Lee, Kevin JamiesonICML 2026
- BooVI: Provably Efficient Bootstrapped Value IterationBoyi Liu, Qi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangNeurIPS 2021
- Boosting Reinforcement Learning with Strongly Delayed Feedback Through Auxiliary Short DelaysQingyuan Wu, Simon Sinong Zhan, Yixuan Wang, Yuhui Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Posterior SamplingYing Fan, Yifei MingICML 2021 · 25 citations
- Delay-Adapted Policy Optimization and Improved Regret for Adversarial MDP with Delayed Bandit FeedbackTal Lancewicki, Aviv Rosenberg, Dmitry SotnikovICML 2023 · 6 citations
