Online Joint Replenishment Problem with Arbitrary Holding and Backlog Costs
Yossi Azar, Shahar Lewkowicz
Abstract
In their seminal paper Moseley, Niaparast, and Ravi introduced the Joint Replenishment Problem (JRP) with holding and backlog costs that models the trade-off between ordering costs, holding costs, and backlog costs in supply chain planning systems. Their model generalized the classical make-to-order version as well maketo-stock version. For the case where holding costs function of all items are the same and all backlog costs are the same, they provide a constant competitive algorithm, leaving designing a constant competitive algorithm for arbitrary functions open. Moreover, they noticed that their algorithm does not work for arbitrary (request dependent) holding costs and backlog costs functions. We resolve their open problem and design a constant competitive algorithm that works for arbitrary request dependent functions. Specifically, we establish a 4-competitive algorithm for the single-item case and a 16-competitive for the general (multi-item) version. The algorithm of Moseley, Niaparast, and Ravi is based on fixed priority on the requests to items, and request to an item are always served by order of deadlines. In contrast, we design an algorithm with dynamic priority over the requests such that instead of servicing a prefix by deadline of requests, we may need to service a general subset of the requests.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Improved Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Outliers, and with Fairness ConstraintsVarun Suriyanarayana, Varun Sivashankar, Siddharth Gollapudi, David B. ShmoysSODA 2024
- The Power of Clairvoyance for Multi-Level Aggregation and Set Cover with DelayNgoc Mai Le, Seeun William Umboh, Ningyuan XieSODA 2023 · 4 citations
- Non-uniform Geometric Set Cover and Scheduling on Multiple MachinesNikhil Bansal, Jatin BatraSODA 2021 · 4 citations
- Online Resource Allocation with Concave, Diminishing-Returns ObjectivesKalen PattonSODA 2026 · 3 citations
- Almost Tight Bounds for Online Facility Location in the Random-Order ModelHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2023 · 8 citations
