Do WGANs succeed because they minimize the Wasserstein Distance? Lessons from Discrete Generators
Ariel Elnekave, Yair Weiss
Abstract
Since WGANs were first introduced, there has been considerable debate on whether their success in generating realistic images can be attributed to minimizing the Wasserstein distance between the distribution of generated images and the training distribution. In this paper, we present theoretical and experimental results that show that WGANs do minimize the Wasserstein distance but the form of the distance that is minimized depends highly on the discriminator architecture and its inductive biases. Specifically, we show that when the discriminator is convolutional, WGANs minimize the Wasserstein distance between patches in the generated images and the training images, not the Wasserstein distance between images. Our results leverage the advantages of discrete generators for which the Wasserstein distance between the generator distribution and the training distribution can be computed exactly and the minima can be characterized analytically. We present experimental results with discrete GANs that generate realistic fake images (comparable in quality to their continuous counterparts) and present evidence that they are minimizing the Wasserstein distance between real and fake patches and not the distance between real and fake images. Our code is available at https://github.com/ariel415el/DiscreteGANs.git
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 97e3fd40-39f3-4157-a38c-4c45e2d609b3Builds on10
- SinGAN: Learning a Generative Model From a Single Natural ImageTamar Rott Shaham, Tali Dekel, Tomer MichaeliICCV 2019 · 933 citations
- StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse DatasetsAxel Sauer, Katja Schwarz, Andreas GeigerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 326 citations
- Towards Faster and Stabilized GAN Training for High-fidelity Few-shot Image SynthesisBingchen Liu, Yizhe Zhu, Kunpeng Song, Ahmed ElgammalICLR 2021 · 307 citations
- Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-based Manipulation on the Generative Image ManifoldXingang Pan, Ayush Tewari, Thomas Leimkühler, Lingjie Liu et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 206 citations
- Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 BenchmarkAlexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Aude Genevay, Justin M. Solomon et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
Related papers
- Bridging the Gap Between f-GANs and Wasserstein GANsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICML 2020 · 45 citations
- Minimax Optimality (Probably) Doesn't Imply Distribution Learning for GANsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Yuanzhi Li, Raghu MekaICLR 2022 · 6 citations
- Wasserstein GAN With Quadratic Transport CostHuidong Liu, Xianfeng Gu, Dimitris SamarasICCV 2019 · 104 citations
- On Relativistic f-DivergencesAlexia Jolicoeur-MartineauICML 2020 · 22 citations
- Towards Generalized Implementation of Wasserstein Distance in GANsMinkai XuAAAI 2021 · 15 citations
