Unified Time Series Explanations via Amortized Optimization and Instance-level Multi-Expert Knowledge Distillation
Viet-Hung Tran, Zichi Zhang, Ngoc Doan, Xuan Hoang Nguyen, Phi Nguyen, Yimeng An, Peixin Li, Hans Vandierendonck, Ira Assent, Thai Son Mai
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve high accuracy on time series classification (TSC) but remain opaque, hindering deployment in sensitive domains. Existing post-hoc TSC explanation methods rely on a single attribution perspective and incur high per-instance computational cost, limiting real-time use. We propose XMA, a framework that unifies multiple post-hoc explainers at the instance level and amortizes the cost of explanation into a learned inference pass. Instance-level Multi-Expert Knowledge Distillation (IMEKD) selects, per instance, the attribution map with the highest combined faithfulness and robustness score from a pool of XAI experts. Objective-Regularized Amortized Optimization Explanation (ORAOE) trains an explainer DNN to reproduce this instance-best supervision while directly optimizing differentiable faithfulness and robustness objectives, letting the student refine beyond any individual teacher. Faithfulness-Preserving Segmentation (FPS) converts point-wise maps into contiguous segments without changing their faithfulness score. Across four synthetic datasets, MIT-ECG with cardiologist-verified ground truth, and 11 multivariate UEA benchmarks on three DNN architectures, XMA attains the best AUPRC on all synthetic and MIT-ECG benchmarks among compared methods, and the highest faithfulness on 7 of 11 and robustness on 8 of 11 UEA datasets, while amortizing explanation into a lightweight learned explainer rather than relying on per-instance optimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9733e6c4-cf49-46ae-856b-c2e5278503d2Builds on14
- A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with TransformersYuqi Nie, Nam H. Nguyen, Phanwadee Sinthong, Jayant KalagnanamICLR 2023 · 536 citations
- Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc ExplanationsTessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2022 · 126 citations
- Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic MasksJonathan Crabbé, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2021 · 115 citations
- Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior ConsistencyOwen Queen, Tom Hartvigsen, Teddy Koker, Huan He et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
- TimeX++: Learning Time-Series Explanations with Information BottleneckZichuan Liu, Tianchun Wang, Jimeng Shi, Xu Zheng et al.ICML 2024 · 33 citations
Related papers
- MIX: A Multi-view Time-Frequency Interactive Explanation Framework for Time Series ClassificationViet-Hung Tran, Ngoc Phu Doan, Zichi Zhang, Tuan Dung Pham et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- InteDisUX: Intepretation-Guided Discriminative User-Centric Explanation for Time SeriesViet-Hung Tran, Zichi Zhang, Tuan Dung Pham, Ngoc Phu Doan et al.AAAI 2025
- AnchorMoE: Interpretable Time Series Classification via Anchor-Routed MoETao Xie, Zexi Tan, Haoyi Xiao, Mengke Li et al.KDD 2026 · 4 citations
- Counterfactual eXplainable AI (XAI) Method for Deep Learning-Based Multivariate Time Series ClassificationAlan G. Paredes Cetina, Kaouther Benguessoum, Raoni Lourenço, Sylvain KublerAAAI 2026
- Explainable Federated Learning via Global–Local Attribution AlignmentDawood Wasif, Terrence Moore, Chang-Tien Lu, Jin-Hee ChoICML 2026
