TamEdit: Trajectory-Aware Meta-Learning for Specificity-Preserving Continual Knowledge Editing
Shiqiang Tian, Cheng Ding, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, Liang He
Abstract
Knowledge editing is a promising method for updating Large Language Models efficiently. However, previous studies often suffer from poor specificity in continual editing, as they typically focus on single edits or preventing knowledge forgetting. To address this, we propose TamEdit, a trajectory-aware meta-learning method that preserves specificity for continual knowledge editing. TamEdit unifies three levels: Inner Optimization performs multi-step fast fine-tuning on the single edit; Trajectorybased Editing unifies continual edits with a growing memory; and Outer Optimization leverages meta-learning to distill cross-task strategies for preserving specificity. By capturing the relationships between different single edits within the trajectory, our method learns how to effectively avoid specificity drift. Experiments across multiple LLMs show TamEdit significantly outperforms baselines in continual editing, improving specificity by 14.81% with sub-second inference speed (0.55s per edit), while preserving general capabilities. * Equal contribution. † Corresponding author. (b) Latent Drift (a) Specificity Loss Specificity Drift! Greedy Methods TamEdit (Ours) Greedy Methods TamEdit (Ours) Target: The capital of Australia is Canberra. Specificity: The capital of Japan is Tokyo. Target: The capital of Australia is Sydney. Specificity: The capital of Japan is Sydney. Target: The capital of Australia is Canberra. Specificity: The capital of Japan is Tokyo. Target: The capital of Australia is Sydney. Specificity: The capital of Japan is Sydney.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 96f44aa8-0a80-4f01-9e55-39bd67288535Builds on24
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Aging with GRACE: Lifelong Model Editing with Discrete Key-Value AdaptorsTom Hartvigsen, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Hamid Palangi, Yoon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 349 citations
- MELO: Enhancing Model Editing with Neuron-Indexed Dynamic LoRALang Yu, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, Liang HeAAAI 2024 · 96 citations
Related papers
- Revealing and Mitigating Over-Attention in Knowledge EditingPinzheng Wang, Zecheng Tang, Keyan Zhou, Juntao Li et al.ICLR 2025
- AdaEdit: Advancing Continuous Knowledge Editing For Large Language ModelsQi Li, Xiaowen ChuACL 2025
- Unlocking Efficient, Scalable, and Continual Knowledge Editing with Basis-Level Representation Fine-TuningTianci Liu, Ruirui Li, Yunzhe Qi, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2025
- Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge EditingYuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- Towards Scalable Lifelong Knowledge Editing with Selective Knowledge SuppressionDahyun Jung, Jaewook Lee, Heuiseok LimACL 2026
