RePO: Understanding Preference Learning Through ReLU-Based Optimization
Junkang Wu, Kexin Huang, Xue Wang, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Jiancan Wu, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang
Abstract
Preference learning has become a common approach in various recent methods for aligning large language models with human values. These methods optimize the preference margin between chosen and rejected responses, subject to certain constraints for avoiding over-optimization. In this paper, we report surprising empirical findings that simple ReLU activation can learn meaningful alignments even using none of the following: (i) sigmoid-based gradient constraints, (ii) explicit regularization terms. Our experiments show that over-optimization does exist, but a threshold parameter γ plays an essential role in preventing it by dynamically filtering training examples. We further provide theoretical analysis demonstrating that ReLU-based Preference Optimization (RePO) corresponds to the convex envelope of the 0-1 loss, establishing its fundamental soundness. Our "RePO" method achieves competitive or superior results compared to established preference optimization approaches. We hope this simple baseline will motivate researchers to rethink the fundamental mechanisms behind preference optimization for language model alignment.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on32
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
Related papers
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- A Common Pitfall of Margin-based Language Model Alignment: Gradient EntanglementHui Yuan, Yifan Zeng, Yue Wu, Huazheng Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- RMO: Towards Better LLM Alignment via Reshaping Reward Margin DistributionsYanchi Ru, Yue Huang, Xiangliang ZhangAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
