Encountering Friction, Understanding Crises: How Do Digital Natives Make Sense of Crisis Maps?
Laura Koesten, Antonia Saske, Sandra Maria Starchenko, Kathleen Gregory
Abstract
Crisis maps are regarded as crucial tools in crisis communication, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change crises. However, there is limited understanding of how public audiences engage with these maps and extract essential information.
Our study investigates the sensemaking of young, digitally native viewers as they interact with crisis maps. We integrate frameworks from the learning sciences and human-data interaction to explore sensemaking through two empirical studies: a thematic analysis of online comments from a New York Times series on graph comprehension, and interviews with 18 participants from German-speaking regions. Our analysis categorizes sensemaking activities into established clusters: inspecting, engaging with content, and placing, and introduces responding personally to capture the affective dimension. We identify friction points connected to these clusters, including struggles with color concepts, responses to missing context, lack of personal connection, and distrust, offering insights for improving crisis communication to public audiences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 964e32c2-9406-4677-88ca-5b3ee1a29b3fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science OnlineCrystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle D. Inchoco, Graham M. Jones et al.CHI 2021 · 140 citations
- Affective Learning Objectives for Communicative VisualizationsElsie Lee-Robbins, Eytan AdarIEEE VIS 2022 · 83 citations
- Mapping the Landscape of COVID-19 Crisis VisualizationsYixuan Zhang, Yifan Sun, Lace M. K. Padilla, Sumit Barua et al.CHI 2021 · 74 citations
- CALVI: Critical Thinking Assessment for Literacy in VisualizationsLily W. Ge, Yuan Cui, Matthew KayCHI 2023 · 68 citations
- Misleading Beyond Visual Tricks: How People Actually Lie with ChartsMaxim Lisnic, Cole Polychronis, Alexander Lex, Marina KoganCHI 2023 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Nudging with Narrative Visualization: Communicating to a Young Adult Audience in the PandemicNina Errey, Christy Jie Liang, Tuck Wah Leong, Yongqing Chen et al.CSCW 2024 · 5 citations
- Making Sense of the Weather, Together: Collaborative Sensemaking in Severe Weather LivestreamsJulie A. Vera, David W. McDonald, Mark ZachryCSCW 2026
- Visualizing Urban Accessibility: Investigating Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives through a Map-based Design Probe StudyManaswi Saha, Siddhant Patil, Emily Cho, Evie Yu-Yen Cheng et al.CHI 2022 · 17 citations
- "Self-Quaranteens" Process COVID-19: Understanding Information Visualization Language in MemesLaura J. Perovich, Meryl Alper, Corey ClevelandCSCW 2022 · 5 citations
- An Activity Theory Analysis of Search & Rescue Collective Sensemaking and Planning PracticesSultan A. Alharthi, Nicolas James LaLone, Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Igor Dolgov et al.CHI 2021 · 20 citations
