Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEs
Sungje Park, Stephen Tu
Abstract
Backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE)-based deep learning methods provide an alternative to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs), offering potential algorithmic advantages in settings such as stochastic optimal control, where the PDEs of interest are tied to an underlying dynamical system. However, standard BSDEbased solvers have empirically been shown to underperform relative to PINNs in the literature. In this paper, we identify the root cause of this performance gap as a discretization bias introduced by the standard Euler-Maruyama (EM) integration scheme applied to one-step self-consistency BSDE losses, which shifts the optimization landscape off target. We find that this bias cannot be satisfactorily addressed through finer step-sizes or multi-step self-consistency losses. To properly handle this issue, we propose a Stratonovich-based BSDE formulation, which we implement with stochastic Heun integration. We show that our proposed approach completely eliminates the bias issues faced by EM integration. Furthermore, our empirical results show that our Heun-based BSDE method consistently outperforms EM-based variants and achieves competitive results with PINNs across multiple high-dimensional benchmarks. Our findings highlight the critical role of integration schemes in BSDE-based PDE solvers, an algorithmic detail that has received little attention thus far in the literature.
2 involving a time-pair distribution ρ over I 2 , where ∆t ∶= t f -ts. We choose to present (3.5) as it more closely aligns with the discrete losses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape PerspectivePratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu et al.ICML 2024 · 137 citations
- Efficient and Accurate Gradients for Neural SDEsPatrick Kidger, James Foster, Xuechen Li, Terry J. LyonsNeurIPS 2021 · 107 citations
- Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) SamplingArka Daw, Jie Bu, Sifan Wang, Paris Perdikaris et al.ICML 2023 · 95 citations
Related papers
- Unbiased and Second-Order-Free Training for High-Dimensional PDEsJaemin Seo, Su Rin Lee, JaeYong LeeICML 2026 · 1 citation
- How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs?Changhoon Song, Yesom Park, Myungjoo KangNeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Solving Poisson Equations using Neural Walk-on-SpheresHong Chul Nam, Julius Berner, Anima AnandkumarICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Physics-informed Neural Networks for Functional Differential Equations: Cylindrical Approximation and Its Convergence GuaranteesTaiki Miyagawa, Takeru YokotaNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural NetworksLeo Zhiyuan Zhao, Xueying Ding, B. Aditya PrakashICLR 2024
