Information-Driven Design of Imaging Systems
Henry Pinkard, Leyla A. Kabuli, Eric Markley, Tiffany Chien, Jiantao Jiao, Laura Waller
Abstract
Imaging systems have traditionally been designed to mimic the human eye and produce visually interpretable measurements. Modern imaging systems, however, process raw measurements computationally before or instead of human viewing. As a result, the information content of raw measurements matters more than their visual interpretability. Despite the importance of measurement information content, current approaches for evaluating imaging system performance do not quantify it: they instead either use alternative metrics that assess specific aspects of measurement quality or assess measurements indirectly with performance on secondary tasks. We developed the theoretical foundations and a practical method to directly quantify mutual information between noisy measurements and unknown objects. By fitting probabilistic models to measurements and their noise characteristics, our method estimates information by upper bounding its true value. By applying gradient-based optimization to these estimates, we also developed a technique for designing imaging systems called Information-Driven Encoder Analysis Learning (IDEAL). Our information estimates accurately captured system performance differences across four imaging domains (color photography, radio astronomy, lensless imaging, and microscopy). Systems designed with IDEAL matched the performance of those designed with end-to-end optimization, the prevailing approach that jointly optimizes hardware and image processing algorithms. These results establish mutual information as a universal performance metric for imaging systems that enables both computationally efficient design optimization and evaluation in real-world conditions. A video summarizing this work can be found at: https://waller-lab.github.io/EncodingInformationWebsite/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9634b5ff-1cb3-4673-99d3-347673c14a0eBuilds on13
- Understanding the Limitations of Variational Mutual Information EstimatorsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICLR 2020 · 243 citations
- End-to-end complex lens design with differentiate ray tracingQilin Sun, Congli Wang, Qiang Fu, Xiong Dun et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 154 citations
- Beyond Normal: On the Evaluation of Mutual Information EstimatorsPawel Czyz, Frederic Grabowski, Julia E. Vogt, Niko Beerenwinkel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 72 citations
- On Density Estimation with Diffusion ModelsDiederik P. Kingma, Tim Salimans, Ben Poole, Jonathan HoNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
- Sliced Mutual Information: A Scalable Measure of Statistical DependenceZiv Goldfeld, Kristjan H. GreenewaldNeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
Related papers
- An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality MetricSangnie Bhardwaj, Ian Fischer, Johannes Ballé, Troy T. ChinenNeurIPS 2020 · 38 citations
- Towards Photorealistic Reconstruction of Highly Multiplexed Lensless ImagesSalman Siddique Khan, Adarsh V. R, Vivek Boominathan, Jasper Tan et al.ICCV 2019 · 34 citations
- Evaluating Unsupervised Denoising Requires Unsupervised MetricsAdria Marcos-Morales, Matan Leibovich, Sreyas Mohan, Joshua Lawrence Vincent et al.ICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Learning a distance measure from the information-estimation geometry of dataGuy Ohayon, Pierre-Étienne H. Fiquet, Florentin Guth, Jona Ballé et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- InfoBridge: Mutual Information estimation via Bridge MatchingSergei Kholkin, Ivan Butakov, Evgeny Burnaev, Nikita Gushchin et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
