Understanding and Finding JIT Compiler Performance Bugs
Zijian Yi, Cheng Ding, August Shi, Milos Gligoric
Abstract
Just-in-time (JIT) compilers are key components for many popular programming languages with managed runtimes (e.g., Java and JavaScript). JIT compilers perform optimizations and generate native code at runtime based on dynamic profiling data, to improve the execution performance of the running application. Like other software systems, JIT compilers might have software bugs, and prior work has developed a number of automated techniques for detecting functional bugs (i.e., generated native code does not semantically match that of the original code). However, no prior work has targeted JIT compiler performance bugs, which can cause significant performance degradation while an application is running. These performance bugs are challenging to detect due to the complexity and dynamic nature of JIT compilers. In this paper, we present the first work on demystifying JIT performance bugs. First, we perform an empirical study across four popular JIT compilers for Java and JavaScript. Our manual analysis of 191 bug reports uncovers common triggers of performance bugs, patterns in which these bugs manifest, and their root causes. Second, informed by these insights, we propose layered differential performance testing, a lightweight technique to automatically detect JIT compiler performance bugs, and implement it in a tool called Jittery. We incorporate practical optimizations into Jittery such as test prioritization, which reduces testing time by 92.40% without compromising bug-detection capability, and automatic filtering of false-positives and duplicates, which substantially reduces manual inspection effort. Using Jittery, we discovered 12 previously unknown performance bugs in the Oracle HotSpot and Graal JIT compilers, with 11 confirmed and 6 fixed by developers.
CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Just-in-time compilers; Software performance; Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 962d3312-9cb6-43d8-a1fa-603987487548Builds on28
- APOLLO: Automatic Detection and Diagnosis of Performance Regressions in Database SystemsJinho Jung, Hong Hu, Joy Arulraj, Taesoo Kim et al.VLDB 2020 · 77 citations
- History-Driven Test Program Synthesis for JVM TestingYingquan Zhao, Zan Wang, Junjie Chen, Mengdi Liu et al.ICSE 2022 · 51 citations
- Finding missed optimizations through the lens of dead code eliminationTheodoros Theodoridis, Manuel Rigger, Zhendong SuASPLOS 2022 · 48 citations
- Fuzzing Loop Optimizations in Compilers for C++ and Data-Parallel LanguagesVsevolod Livinskii, Dmitry Babokin, John RegehrPLDI 2023 · 42 citations
- Formally verified speculation and deoptimization in a JIT compilerAurèle Barrière, Sandrine Blazy, Olivier Flückiger, David Pichardie et al.POPL 2021 · 38 citations
Related papers
- Detecting JVM JIT Compiler Bugs via Exploring Two-Dimensional Input SpacesHaoxiang Jia, Ming Wen, Zifan Xie, Xiaochen Guo et al.ICSE 2023 · 21 citations
- JIT-Picking: Differential Fuzzing of JavaScript EnginesLukas Bernhard, Tobias Scharnowski, Moritz Schloegel, Tim Blazytko et al.CCS 2022 · 42 citations
- Java JIT Testing with Template ExtractionZhiqiang Zang, Fu-Yao Yu, Aditya Thimmaiah, August Shi et al.FSE 2024 · 8 citations
- FuzzJIT: Oracle-Enhanced Fuzzing for JavaScript Engine JIT CompilerJunjie Wang, Zhiyi Zhang, Shuang Liu, Xiaoning Du et al.USENIX Security 2023
- FUZZILLI: Fuzzing for JavaScript JIT Compiler VulnerabilitiesSamuel Groß, Simon Koch, Lukas Bernhard, Thorsten Holz et al.NDSS 2023
