Leakage and Tamper Resilient Permutation-Based Cryptography
Christoph Dobraunig, Bart Mennink, Robert Primas
Abstract
Implementation attacks such as power analysis and fault attacks have shown that, if potential attackers have physical access to a cryptographic device, achieving practical security requires more considerations apart from just cryptanalytic security. In recent years, and with the advent of micro-architectural or hardwareoriented attacks, it became more and more clear that similar attack vectors can also be exploited on larger computing platforms and without the requirement of physical proximity of an attacker. While newly discovered attacks typically come with implementation recommendations that help counteract a specific attack vector, the process of constantly patching cryptographic code is quite time consuming in some cases, and simply not possible in other cases. What adds up to the problem is that the popular approach of leakage resilient cryptography only provably solves part of the problem: it discards the threat of faults. Therefore, we put forward the usage of leakage and tamper resilient cryptographic algorithms, as they can offer built-in protection against various types of physical and hardware oriented attacks, likely including attack vectors that will only be discovered in the future. In detail, we present the -to the best of our knowledge -first framework for proving the security of permutation-based symmetric cryptographic constructions in the leakage and tamper resilient setting. As a proof of concept, we apply the framework to a sponge-based stream encryption scheme called asakey and provide a practical analysis of its resistance against side channel and fault attacks. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Side-channel analysis and countermeasures; Tamper-proof and tamper-resistant designs; Embedded systems security; Block and stream ciphers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM Addressing for Cross-CPU AttacksPeter Pessl, Daniel Gruss, Clémentine Maurice, Michael Schwarz et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 500 citations
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2018 · 288 citations
- PLATYPUS: Software-based Power Side-Channel Attacks on x86Moritz Lipp, Andreas Kogler, David F. Oswald, Michael Schwarz et al.S&P 2021 · 242 citations
Related papers
- Mode-Level vs. Implementation-Level Physical Security in Symmetric Cryptography - A Practical Guide Through the Leakage-Resistance JungleDavide Bellizia, Olivier Bronchain, Gaëtan Cassiers, Vincent Grosso et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 38 citations
- Leakage Resilient Value Comparison with Application to Message AuthenticationChristoph Dobraunig, Bart MenninkEUROCRYPT 2021 · 12 citations
- Friet: An Authenticated Encryption Scheme with Built-in Fault DetectionThierry Simon, Lejla Batina, Joan Daemen, Vincent Grosso et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 40 citations
- Impeccable Circuits IIAein Rezaei Shahmirzadi, Shahram Rasoolzadeh, Amir MoradiDAC 2020 · 34 citations
- PERSEUS - Probabilistic Evaluation of Random Probing SEcurity Using Efficient SamplingSonia Belaïd, Gaëtan CassiersEUROCRYPT 2026
