Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models
Yu Bai, Heyan Huang, Cesare Spinoso Di Piano, Sanxing Chen, Marc-Antoine Rondeau, Yang Gao, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung
Abstract
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as an effective solution for few-shot learning with large language models (LLMs). However, how LLMs leverage demonstrations to specify a task and learn a corresponding computational function through ICL is underexplored. Drawing from the way humans learn from content-label mappings in demonstrations, we categorize the tokens in an ICL prompt into content, stopword, and template tokens. Our goal is to identify the types of tokens whose representations directly influence LLM's performance, a property we refer to as being performance-critical. By ablating representations from the attention of the test example, we find that the representations of informative content tokens have less influence on performance compared to template and stopword tokens, which contrasts with the human attention to informative words. We give evidence that the representations of performance-critical tokens aggregate information from the content tokens. Moreover, we demonstrate experimentally that lexical meaning, repetition, and structural cues are the main distinguishing characteristics of these tokens. Our work sheds light on how LLMs learn to perform tasks from demonstrations and deepens our understanding of the roles different types of tokens play in LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on7
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- Function Vectors in Large Language ModelsEric Todd, Millicent L. Li, Arnab Sen Sharma, Aaron Mueller et al.ICLR 2024 · 229 citations
- Ground-Truth Labels Matter: A Deeper Look into Input-Label DemonstrationsKang Min Yoo, Junyeob Kim, Hyuhng Joon Kim, Hyunsoo Cho et al.EMNLP 2022 · 40 citations
- Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context LearningLean Wang, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Deli Chen et al.EMNLP 2023 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Focused Large Language Models are Stable Many-Shot LearnersPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.EMNLP 2024
- Shared Lexical Task Representations Explain Behavioral Variability In LLMsZhuonan Yang, Jacob Xiaochen Li, Francisco Velez, Eric Todd et al.ICML 2026
- Do different prompting methods yield a common task representation in language models?Guy Davidson, Todd M. Gureckis, Brenden M. Lake, Adina WilliamsNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Revisiting In-context Learning Inference Circuit in Large Language ModelsHakaze Cho, Mariko Kato, Yoshihiro Sakai, Naoya InoueICLR 2025
- When Parts Are Greater Than Sums: Individual LLM Components Can Outperform Full ModelsTing-Yun Chang, Jesse Thomason, Robin JiaEMNLP 2024
