Spot The Ball: A Benchmark for Visual Social Inference
Neha Balamurugan, Sarah A. Wu, Cristóbal Eyzaguirre, Tobias Gerstenberg
Abstract
Humans excel at visual social inference, the ability to infer hidden elements of a scene from subtle behavioral cues such as other people's gaze, pose, and orientation. This ability drives everyday social reasoning in humans and is critical for developing more human-like AI agents. We introduce Spot The Ball, a challenging benchmark for evaluating visual social inference in vision-language models (VLMs) using sports as a test domain. The task is to localize a removed sports ball from soccer, basketball, and volleyball images. We present a curated evaluation set with human baselines and a scalable pipeline for generating additional test items. We evaluate four state-of-the-art VLMs (Gemini, GPT, LLaMA, Qwen) using three prompting strategies, finding that humans are consistently two to three times more accurate (20-34%) than models ( 17%) across all sports. Our analyses show that models rely on superficial spatial heuristics--such as guessing near the image center or nearby players--while humans leverage social cues like gaze direction and body pose. These findings reveal a persistent human-model gap in visual social reasoning and underscore the need for architectures that explicitly encode structured behavioral cues to achieve robust, human-like inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMsNino Scherrer, Claudia Shi, Amir Feder, David M. BleiNeurIPS 2023 · 316 citations
- Apathetic or Empathetic? Evaluating LLMs' Emotional Alignments with HumansJen-tse Huang, Man Ho Lam, Eric John Li, Shujie Ren et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of MindHaojun Shi, Suyu Ye, Xinyu Fang, Chuanyang Jin et al.AAAI 2025 · 48 citations
- MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question AnsweringChuanyang Jin, Yutong Wu, Jing Cao, Jiannan Xiang et al.ACL 2024 · 8 citations
Related papers
- SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical EvaluationWenyu Zhang, Wei En Ng, Lixin Ma, Yuwen Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 20 citations
- GeoRC: A Benchmark for Geolocation Reasoning ChainsMohit Talreja, Joshua Diao, Jim James, Radu Casapu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Single-View Sufficiency: CVBench for Cross-View Human UnderstandingTianchen Guo, Chen Liu, Xin YuCVPR 2026
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 195 citations
- VLMs have Tunnel Vision: Evaluating Nonlocal Visual Reasoning in Leading VLMsShmuel Berman, Jia DengNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
