Bayesian Inference for Correlated Human Experts and Classifiers
Markelle Kelly, Alex James Boyd, Samuel Showalter, Mark Steyvers, Padhraic Smyth
Abstract
Applications of machine learning often involve making predictions based on both model outputs and the opinions of human experts. In this context, we investigate the problem of querying experts for class label predictions, using as few human queries as possible, and leveraging the class probability estimates of pre-trained classifiers. We develop a general Bayesian framework for this problem, modeling expert correlation via a joint latent representation, enabling simulation-based inference about the utility of additional expert queries, as well as inference of posterior distributions over unobserved expert labels. We apply our approach to two real-world medical classification problems, as well as to CIFAR-10H and ImageNet-16H, demonstrating substantial reductions relative to baselines in the cost of querying human experts while maintaining high prediction accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 93ee26a2-4072-47fb-a06f-4bd313320515Builds on13
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Human Uncertainty Makes Classification More RobustJoshua C. Peterson, Ruairidh M. Battleday, Thomas L. Griffiths, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2019 · 362 citations
- Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for TeamworkGagan Bansal, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Eric Horvitz et al.AAAI 2021 · 185 citations
- A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic ScoresMaria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra ChouldechovaCHI 2020 · 176 citations
- Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Ying Lei, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2023 · 139 citations
Related papers
- Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and CalibrationGavin Kerrigan, Padhraic Smyth, Mark SteyversNeurIPS 2021 · 79 citations
- Bayesian Meta-Learning with Expert Feedback for Task-Shift Adaptation through Causal EmbeddingsLotta Mäkinen, Jorge Loria, Samuel KaskiICML 2026
- Domain constraints improve risk prediction when outcome data is missingSidhika Balachandar, Nikhil Garg, Emma PiersonICLR 2024 · 11 citations
- Multifidelity Simulation-based Inference for Computationally Expensive SimulatorsAnastasia Nastya Krouglova, Hayden R. Johnson, Basile Confavreux, Michael Deistler et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Active Bayesian Assessment of Black-Box ClassifiersDisi Ji, Robert L. Logan IV, Padhraic Smyth, Mark SteyversAAAI 2021 · 3 citations
