Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Fabian H. Sinz
Abstract
In recent years, deep learning models have set new standards in predicting neural population responses. Most of these models currently focus on predicting the mean response of each neuron for a given input. However, neural variability around this mean is not just noise and plays a central role in several theories on neural computation. To capture this variability, we need models that predict full response distributions for a given stimulus. However, to measure the quality of such models, commonly used correlation-based metrics are not sufficient as they mainly care about the mean of the response distribution. An interpretable alternative evaluation metric for likelihood-based models is Information Gain (IG) which evaluates the likelihood of a model relative to a lower and upper bound. However, while a lower bound is usually easy to obtain, constructing an upper bound turns out to be challenging for neural recordings with relatively low numbers of repeated trials, high (shared) variability, and sparse responses. In this work, we generalize the jack-knife oracle estimator for the mean---commonly used for correlation metrics---to a flexible Bayesian oracle estimator for IG based on posterior predictive distributions. We describe and address the challenges that arise when estimating the lower and upper bounds from small datasets. We then show that our upper bound estimate is data-efficient and robust even in the case of sparse responses and low signal-to-noise ratio. We further provide the derivation of the upper bound estimator for a variety of common distributions including the state-of-the-art zero-inflated mixture models, and relate IG to common mean-based metrics. Finally, we use our approach to evaluate such a mixture model resulting in IG performance.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 93507d4c-7c86-4bef-b909-93b1f9c2c4b6Cited by top-tier papers2
- Taking the neural sampling code very seriously: A data-driven approach for evaluating generative models of the visual systemSuhas Shrinivasan, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Kelli Restivo, George H. Denfield et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Modeling Dynamic Neural Activity by combining Naturalistic Video Stimuli and Stimulus-independent Latent FactorsFinn Schmidt, Polina Turishcheva, Suhas Shrinivasan, Fabian H. SinzNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental DesignNoble Kennamer, Steven Walton, Alexander IhlerAAAI 2023 · 7 citations
- Neural Approximate Sufficient Statistics for Implicit ModelsYanzhi Chen, Dinghuai Zhang, Michael U. Gutmann, Aaron C. Courville et al.ICLR 2021 · 21 citations
- A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural imagesMohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Akshay Kumar Jagadish et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 31 citations
- Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence FunctionsAhmed M. Alaa, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2020 · 59 citations
- A universal probabilistic spike count model reveals ongoing modulation of neural variabilityDavid Liu, Máté LengyelNeurIPS 2021 · 10 citations
