Policy Sandboxing: Empathy As An Enabler Towards Inclusive Policy-Making
Andrea Mauri, Yen-Chia Hsu, Himanshu Verma, Andrea Tocchetti, Marco Brambilla, Alessandro Bozzon
Abstract
Digitally-supported participatory methods are often used in policy-making to develop inclusive policies by collecting and integrating citizen's opinions. However, these methods fail to capture the complexity and nuances in citizen's needs, i.e., citizens are generally unaware of other's needs, perspectives, and experiences. Consequently, policies developed with this underlying gap tend to overlook the alignment of multistakeholder perspectives, and design policies based on the optimization of high-level demographic features. In our contribution, we propose a method to enable citizens understand other's perspectives and calibrate their positions. First, we collected requirements and design principles to develop our approach by involving stakeholders and experts in policymaking in a series of workshops. Then, we conducted a crowdsourcing study with 420 participants to compare the effect of different text and images, on people's initial and final motivations and their willingness to change opinions. We observed that both influence participant's opinion change, however, the effect is more pronounced for textual modality. Finally, we discuss overarching implications of designing with empathy to mediate alignment of citizen's perspectives.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 933da95e-6882-404c-9cd7-3bfc779a7704Builds on6
- Moderator Chatbot for Deliberative Discussion: Effects of Discussion Structure and Discussant FacilitationSoomin Kim, Jinsu Eun, Joseph Seering, Joonhwan LeeCSCW 2021 · 84 citations
- AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online DebatesJarod Govers, Eduardo Velloso, Vassilis Kostakos, Jorge GonçalvesCHI 2024 · 34 citations
- Applying Critical Voice in Design of User Interfaces for Supporting Self-Reflection and Emotion Regulation in Online News CommentingJoel Kiskola, Thomas Olsson, Heli Väätäjä, Aleksi H. Syrjämäki et al.CHI 2021 · 30 citations
- Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation PlatformsShunYi Yeo, Gionnieve Lim, Jie Gao, Weiyu Zhang et al.CHI 2024 · 29 citations
- Social Media as a Critical Pedagogical Tool: Examining the Relationship between Youths' Online Sociopolitical Engagements and Their Critical ConsciousnessAdrian Choi, Catherine D'Ignazio, Brooke Foucault Welles, Andrea G. ParkerCHI 2023 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Empathy Prediction from Diverse PerspectivesFrancine Chen, Scott A. Carter, Tatiana Lau, Nayeli Suseth Bravo et al.ACL 2025
- Co-Design of Technology with and for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review of Methods and Inclusion StrategiesJacqueline Johnstone, Madhuka Nadeeshani, Preity Pai, Troy McGee et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Metaverse Perspectives from Japan: A Participatory Speculative Design Case StudyMichel Hohendanner, Chiara Ullstein, Dohjin Miyamoto, Emma Fukuwatari Huffman et al.CSCW 2024 · 25 citations
- Interventions for Softening Can Lead to Hardening of Opinions: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled TrialAndreas Spitz, Ahmad Abu-Akel, Robert WestWWW 2021 · 6 citations
- Speculating Migrant Possible Worlds through Magic MachinesValentina Nisi, Paulo Bala, Vanessa Cesário, Shuhao Ma et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
