Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning
Nicholas Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri
Abstract
Inspired by the problem of improving classification accuracy on rare or hard subsets of a population, there has been recent interest in models of learning where the goal is to generalize to a collection of distributions, each representing a ``group''. We consider a variant of this problem from the perspective of active learning, where the learner is endowed with the power to decide which examples are labeled from each distribution in the collection, and the goal is to minimize the number of label queries while maintaining PAC-learning guarantees. Our main challenge is that standard active learning techniques such as disagreement-based active learning do not directly apply to the multi-group learning objective. We modify existing algorithms to provide a consistent active learning algorithm for an agnostic formulation of multi-group learning, which given a collection of distributions and a hypothesis class with VC-dimension , outputs an -optimal hypothesis using label queries, where is the worst-case disagreement coefficient over the collection. Roughly speaking, this guarantee improves upon the label complexity of standard multi-group learning in regimes where disagreement-based active learning algorithms may be expected to succeed, and the number of groups is not too large. We also consider the special case where each distribution in the collection is individually realizable with respect to , and demonstrate label queries are sufficient for learning in this case. We further give an approximation result for the full agnostic case inspired by the group realizable strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9308476e-294b-4902-81a9-af7e5744cbcfCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Active Sampling for Min-Max FairnessJacob D. Abernethy, Pranjal Awasthi, Matthäus Kleindessner, Jamie Morgenstern et al.ICML 2022 · 57 citations
- On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple DistributionsNika Haghtalab, Michael I. Jordan, Eric ZhaoNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Multi-group Agnostic PAC LearnabilityGuy N. Rothblum, Gal YonaICML 2021 · 48 citations
- Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learningChristopher J. Tosh, Daniel HsuICML 2022 · 28 citations
Related papers
- A Competitive Algorithm for Agnostic Active LearningYihan Zhou, Eric PriceNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
- Agnostic Active Learning Is Always Better Than Passive LearningSteve HannekeNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Improved Algorithms for Agnostic Pool-based Active ClassificationJulian Katz-Samuels, Jifan Zhang, Lalit Jain, Kevin JamiesonICML 2021 · 26 citations
- Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling FunctionsYuyang Deng, Mingda QiaoICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Active Classification with Few Queries under MisspecificationVasilis Kontonis, Mingchen Ma, Christos TzamosNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
