Non-Parametric Probabilistic Robustness: A Conservative Risk Estimator under Unknown Perturbation Distributions
Zheng Wang, Yi Zhang, Siddartha Khastgir, carsten maple, Xingyu Zhao
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models, despite their remarkable success, remain vulnerable to small input perturbations that can cause erroneous outputs, motivating the recent proposal of probabilistic robustness (PR) as a complementary alternative to adversarial robustness (AR). However, existing PR formulations assume a fixed and known perturbation distribution, an unrealistic expectation in practice. To address this limitation, we propose non-parametric probabilistic robustness (NPPR), a more practical PR metric that does not rely on any predefined perturbation distribution. Following the non-parametric paradigm in statistical modeling, NPPR learns an optimized perturbation distribution directly from data, enabling conservative PR evaluation under distributional uncertainty. We further develop an NPPR estimator based on a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), covering various input-dependent and input-independent perturbation scenarios. Theoretical analyses establish the relationships among AR, PR, and NPPR. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet across ResNet18/50, WideResNet50 and VGG16 validate NPPR as a more practical robustness metric, showing conservative (lower) PR estimates compared to assuming those common perturbation distributions used in state-of-the-arts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92aaaaa7-06a0-45a1-ac88-912c2e255b77Builds on9
- Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Transferable Model-based EmbeddingZhichao Huang, Tong ZhangICLR 2020 · 131 citations
- Randomization matters How to defend against strong adversarial attacksRafael Pinot, Raphael Ettedgui, Geovani Rizk, Yann Chevaleyre et al.ICML 2020 · 66 citations
- SAFARI: Versatile and Efficient Evaluations for Robustness of InterpretabilityWei Huang, Xingyu Zhao, Gaojie Jin, Xiaowei HuangICCV 2023 · 41 citations
- Scalable Quantitative Verification For Deep Neural NetworksTeodora Baluta, Zheng Leong Chua, Kuldeep S. Meel, Prateek SaxenaICSE 2021 · 39 citations
- Mixed Nash Equilibria in the Adversarial Examples GameLaurent Meunier, Meyer Scetbon, Rafael Pinot, Jamal Atif et al.ICML 2021 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training for Probabilistic RobustnessYi Zhang, Yuhang Chen, Zhen Chen, Wenjie Ruan et al.ICCV 2025 · 3 citations
- Attack as defense: characterizing adversarial examples using robustnessZhe Zhao, Guangke Chen, Jingyi Wang, Yiwei Yang et al.ISSTA 2021 · 34 citations
- Evaluating Robustness of Predictive Uncertainty Estimation: Are Dirichlet-based Models Reliable?Anna-Kathrin Kopetzki, Bertrand Charpentier, Daniel Zügner, Sandhya Giri et al.ICML 2021 · 55 citations
- Bayesian Learning with Information Gain Provably Bounds Risk for a Robust Adversarial DefenseBao Gia Doan, Ehsan Abbasnejad, Javen Qinfeng Shi, Damith C. RanasingheICML 2022 · 8 citations
- Exploring the Vulnerability of Deep Neural Networks: A Study of Parameter CorruptionXu Sun, Zhiyuan Zhang, Xuancheng Ren, Ruixuan Luo et al.AAAI 2021 · 45 citations
