ACL Findings2024
Phased Instruction Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models
Wei Pang, Chuan Zhou, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Xiaojie Wang
Abstract
Instruction Fine-Tuning enhances pre-trained language models from basic next-word prediction to complex instruction-following. However, existing One-off Instruction Fine-Tuning (One-off IFT) method, applied on a diverse instruction, may not effectively boost models' adherence to instructions due to the simultaneous handling of varying instruction complexities. To improve this, Phased Instruction Fine-Tuning (Phased IFT) is proposed, based on the idea that learning to follow instructions is a gradual process. It assesses instruction difficulty using GPT-4, divides the instruction data into subsets of increasing difficulty, and uptrains the model sequentially on these subsets. Experiments with Llama-2 7B/13B/70B, Llama3 8/70B and Mistral-7B models using Alpaca data show that Phased IFT significantly outperforms One-off IFT, supporting the progressive alignment hypothesis and providing a simple and efficient way to enhance large language models. Codes and datasets from our experiments are freely available at https://github.com/xubuvd/PhasedSFT.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical ReasoningYaning Jia, Chunhui Zhang, Xingjian Diao, Xiangchi Yuan et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- SCRIBE: Structured Chain Reasoning for Interactive Behaviour Explanations using Tool CallingFares Fawzi, Vinitra Swamy, Dominik Glandorf, Tanya Nazaretsky et al.EMNLP 2025
- MentalGLM Series: Explainable Large Language Models for Mental Health Analysis on Chinese Social MediaWei Zhai, Nan Bai, Qing Zhao, Jianqiang Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- Unveiling the Secret Recipe: A Guide For Supervised Fine-Tuning Small LLMsAldo Pareja, Nikhil Shivakumar Nayak, Hao Wang, Krishnateja Killamsetty et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-TuningHao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2024 · 96 citations
- Exploring Two-Phase Continual Instruction Fine-tuning for Multilingual Adaptation in Large Language ModelsDivyanshu Aggarwal, Sankarshan Damle, Navin Goyal, Satya Lokam et al.ACL Findings 2026
- MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuningFanyi Yang, Jianfeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Haoyu Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-TuningJiayu Zhang, Changbang Li, Yinan Peng, Weihao Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
