Drop Clause: Enhancing Performance, Robustness and Pattern Recognition Capabilities of the Tsetlin Machine
Jivitesh Sharma, Rohan Kumar Yadav, Ole-Christoffer Granmo, Lei Jiao
Abstract
Logic-based machine learning has the crucial advantage of transparency. However, despite significant recent progress, further research is needed to close the accuracy gap between logic-based architectures and deep neural network ones. This paper introduces a novel variant of the Tsetlin machine (TM) that randomly drops clauses, the logical learning element of TMs. In effect, TM with Drop Clause ignores a random selection of the clauses in each epoch, selected according to a predefined probability. In this way, the TM learning phase becomes more diverse. To explore the effects that Drop Clause has on accuracy, training time and robustness, we conduct extensive experiments on nine benchmark datasets in natural language processing (IMDb, R8, R52, MR, and TREC) and image classification (MNIST, Fashion MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100). Our proposed model outperforms baseline machine learning algorithms by a wide margin and achieves competitive performance compared with recent deep learning models, such as BERT-Large and AlexNet-DFA. In brief, we observe up to 10% increase in accuracy and 2× to 4× faster in learning than those of the standard TM. We visualize the patterns learnt by Drop Clause TM in the form of heatmaps and show evidence of the ability of drop clause to learn more unique and discriminative patterns. We finally evaluate how Drop Clause affects learning robustness by introducing corruptions and alterations in the image/language test data, which exposes increased learning robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 929ee035-4bd3-46fa-a2ec-4afc289cdbccCited by top-tier papers2
- Generalized Convergence Analysis of Tsetlin Automaton Based Algorithms: A Probabilistic Approach to Concept LearningMohamed-Bachir Belaid, Jivitesh Sharma, Lei Jiao, Ole-Christoffer Granmo et al.AAAI 2025
- Convergence Analysis of Tsetlin Machines under Noise-Free and Noisy Training Conditions: From 2 Bits to k BitsXuan Zhang, Lei Jiao, Ole-Christoffer GranmoICLR 2026
Builds on5
- Simple Spectral Graph ConvolutionHao Zhu, Piotr KoniuszICLR 2021 · 352 citations
- Human-Level Interpretable Learning for Aspect-Based Sentiment AnalysisRohan Kumar Yadav, Lei Jiao, Ole-Christoffer Granmo, Morten GoodwinAAAI 2021 · 96 citations
- Efficient Exact Verification of Binarized Neural NetworksKai Jia, Martin C. RinardNeurIPS 2020 · 70 citations
- Feature Projection for Improved Text ClassificationQi Qin, Wenpeng Hu, Bing LiuACL 2020 · 66 citations
- Massively Parallel and Asynchronous Tsetlin Machine Architecture Supporting Almost Constant-Time ScalingKuruge Darshana Abeyrathna, Bimal Bhattarai, Morten Goodwin, Saeed Rahimi Gorji et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
Related papers
- MaxSAT-Based Compression for Tsetlin MachinesStefan SzeiderICML 2026
- Accelerating Training of Transformer-Based Language Models with Progressive Layer DroppingMinjia Zhang, Yuxiong HeNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- Tsetlin Machine for Solving Contextual Bandit ProblemsRaihan Seraj, Jivitesh Sharma, Ole-Christoffer GranmoNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT SolversHongduo Liu, Peng Xu, Yuan Pu, Lihao Yin et al.DAC 2024 · 2 citations
- The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot LearningEkin Akyürek, Mehul Damani, Adam Zweiger, Linlu Qiu et al.ICML 2025
