War of Words II: Enriched Models of Law-Making Processes
Victor Kristof, Aswin Suresh, Matthias Grossglauser, Patrick Thiran
Abstract
The European Union law-making process is an instance of a peer-production system. We mine a rich dataset of law edits and introduce models predicting their adoption by parliamentary committees. Edits are proposed by parliamentarians, and they can be in conflict with edits of other parliamentarians and with the original proposition in the law. Our models combine three different categories of features: (a) Explicit features extracted from data related to the edits, the parliamentarians, and the laws, (b) latent features that capture bi-linear interactions between parliamentarians and laws, and (c) text features of the edits. We show experimentally that this combination enables us to accurately predict the success of the edits. Furthermore, it leads to model parameters that are interpretable, hence provides valuable insight into the law-making process.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- Learning to Update Natural Language Comments Based on Code ChangesSheena Panthaplackel, Pengyu Nie, Milos Gligoric, Junyi Jessy Li et al.ACL 2020 · 1 citation
- Understanding the Language of Political Agreement and Disagreement in Legislative TextsMaryam Davoodi, Eric Waltenburg, Dan GoldwasserACL 2020 · 15 citations
- Learning Bill Similarity with Annotated and Augmented Corpora of BillsJiseon Kim, Elden Griggs, In Song Kim, Alice OhEMNLP 2021 · 3 citations
- Helping a Friend or Supporting a Cause? Disentangling Active and Passive Cosponsorship in the U.S. CongressGiuseppe Russo, Christoph Gote, Laurence Brandenberger, Sophia Schlosser et al.ACL 2023 · 1 citation
- Variational Inference for Learning Representations of Natural Language EditsEdison Marrese-Taylor, Machel Reid, Yutaka MatsuoAAAI 2021 · 9 citations
