Provable Uncertainty Decomposition via Higher-Order Calibration
Gustaf Ahdritz, Aravind Gollakota, Parikshit Gopalan, Charlotte Peale, Udi Wieder
Abstract
We give a principled method for decomposing the predictive uncertainty of a model into aleatoric and epistemic components with explicit semantics relating them to the real-world data distribution. While many works in the literature have proposed such decompositions, they lack the type of formal guarantees we provide. Our method is based on the new notion of higher-order calibration, which generalizes ordinary calibration to the setting of higher-order predictors that predict mixtures over label distributions at every point. We show how to measure as well as achieve higher-order calibration using access to -snapshots, namely examples where each point has independent conditional labels. Under higher-order calibration, the estimated aleatoric uncertainty at a point is guaranteed to match the real-world aleatoric uncertainty averaged over all points where the prediction is made. To our knowledge, this is the first formal guarantee of this type that places no assumptions whatsoever on the real-world data distribution. Importantly, higher-order calibration is also applicable to existing higher-order predictors such as Bayesian and ensemble models and provides a natural evaluation metric for such models. We demonstrate through experiments that our method produces meaningful uncertainty decompositions for image classification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9224f550-dcf7-4683-a467-4a7bee97178eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured PredictionAndrey Malinin, Mark J. F. GalesICLR 2021 · 439 citations
- Human Uncertainty Makes Classification More RobustJoshua C. Peterson, Ruairidh M. Battleday, Thomas L. Griffiths, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2019 · 362 citations
- Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss MinimisationViktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem WaegemanNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
Related papers
- From Risk to Uncertainty: Generating Predictive Uncertainty Measures via Bayesian EstimationNikita Kotelevskii, Vladimir Kondratyev, Martin Takác, Eric Moulines et al.ICLR 2025
- On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty QuantificationViktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem WaegemanICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Experts Don't Cheat: Learning What You Don't Know By Predicting PairsDaniel D. Johnson, Daniel Tarlow, David Duvenaud, Chris J. MaddisonICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Uncertainty-Aware Deep Classifiers Using Generative ModelsMurat Sensoy, Lance M. Kaplan, Federico Cerutti, Maryam SalekiAAAI 2020 · 88 citations
- UQGAN: A Unified Model for Uncertainty Quantification of Deep Classifiers trained via Conditional GANsPhilipp Oberdiek, Gernot A. Fink, Matthias RottmannNeurIPS 2022 · 30 citations
