Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning
Shiqing Gao, Yihang Zhou, Shuai Shao, Haoyu Luo, Yiheng Bing, Jiaxin Ding, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang
Abstract
Ensuring safety is a critical challenge in applying Reinforcement Learning (RL) to real-world scenarios. Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) addresses this by maximizing returns under predefined constraints, typically formulated as the expected cumulative cost. However, expectationbased constraints overlook rare but high-impact extreme value events in the tail distribution, such as black swan incidents, which can lead to severe constraint violations. To address this issue, we propose the Extreme Value policy Optimization (EVO) algorithm, leveraging Extreme Value Theory (EVT) to model and exploit extreme reward and cost samples, reducing constraint violations. EVO introduces an extreme quantile optimization objective to explicitly capture extreme samples in the cost tail distribution. Additionally, we propose an extreme prioritization mechanism during replay, amplifying the learning signal from rare but high-impact extreme samples. Theoretically, we establish upper bounds on expected constraint violations during policy updates, guaranteeing strict constraint satisfaction at a zeroviolation quantile level. Further, we demonstrate that EVO achieves a lower probability of constraint violations than expectation-based methods and exhibits lower variance than quantile regression methods. Extensive experiments show that EVO significantly reduces constraint violations during training while maintaining competitive policy performance compared to baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 921a87fc-8a42-4866-bf74-561aeff40a4dBuilds on10
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 403 citations
- Projection-Based Constrained Policy OptimizationTsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, Peter J. RamadgeICLR 2020 · 306 citations
- Natural Policy Gradient Primal-Dual Method for Constrained Markov Decision ProcessesDongsheng Ding, Kaiqing Zhang, Tamer Basar, Mihailo R. JovanovicNeurIPS 2020 · 252 citations
- First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy SpaceYiming Zhang, Quan Vuong, Keith W. RossNeurIPS 2020 · 238 citations
- Prediction-Guided Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Robot ControlJie Xu, Yunsheng Tian, Pingchuan Ma, Daniela Rus et al.ICML 2020 · 210 citations
Related papers
- Quantile Constrained Reinforcement Learning: A Reinforcement Learning Framework Constraining Outage ProbabilityWhiyoung Jung, Myungsik Cho, Jongeui Park, Youngchul SungNeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement LearningZuxin Liu, Zhepeng Cen, Vladislav Isenbaev, Wei Liu et al.ICML 2022 · 112 citations
- WCSAC: Worst-Case Soft Actor Critic for Safety-Constrained Reinforcement LearningQisong Yang, Thiago D. Simão, Simon H. Tindemans, Matthijs T. J. SpaanAAAI 2021 · 168 citations
- CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence GuaranteeTengyu Xu, Yingbin Liang, Guanghui LanICML 2021 · 171 citations
- Risk-Averse Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Optimized Certainty EquivalentsJane H. Lee, Baturay Saglam, Spyridon Pougkakiotis, Amin Karbasi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
