Improved Algorithms for Finding Fixed-Degree Isogenies Between Supersingular Elliptic Curves
Benjamin Bencina, Péter Kutas, Simon-Philipp Merz, Christophe Petit, Miha Stopar, Charlotte Weitkämper
Abstract
Finding isogenies between supersingular elliptic curves is a natural algorithmic problem which is known to be equivalent to computing the curves' endomorphism rings. When the isogeny is additionally required to have a specific known degree d, the problem appears to be somewhat different in nature, yet its hardness is also required in isogeny-based cryptography. Let E1, E2 be supersingular elliptic curves over F p 2 . We present improved classical and quantum algorithms that compute an isogeny of degree d between E1 and E2 if it exists. Let d ≈ p 1/2+ϵ for some ϵ > 0. Our essentially memory-free algorithms have better time complexity than meetin-the-middle algorithms, which require exponential memory storage, in the range 1/2 ≤ ϵ ≤ 3/4 on a classical computer. For quantum computers, we improve the time complexity in the range 0 < ϵ < 5/2. Our strategy is to compute the endomorphism rings of both curves, compute the reduced norm form associated to Hom(E1, E2) and try to represent the integer d as a solution of this form. We present multiple approaches to solving this problem which combine guessing certain variables exhaustively (or use Grover's search in the quantum case) with methods for solving quadratic Diophantine equations such as Cornacchia's algorithm and multivariate variants of Coppersmith's method. For the different approaches, we provide implementations and experimental results. A solution to the norm form can then be efficiently translated to recover the sought-after isogeny using well-known techniques. As a consequence of our results we show that a recently introduced signature scheme from [3] does not reach NIST level I security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- An Efficient Key Recovery Attack on SIDHWouter Castryck, Thomas DecruEUROCRYPT 2023 · 284 citations
- Breaking SIDH in Polynomial TimeDamien RobertEUROCRYPT 2023 · 158 citations
- A Direct Key Recovery Attack on SIDHLuciano Maino, Chloe Martindale, Lorenz Panny, Giacomo Pope et al.EUROCRYPT 2023 · 136 citations
- The supersingular isogeny path and endomorphism ring problems are equivalentBenjamin WesolowskiFOCS 2021 · 61 citations
- M-SIDH and MD-SIDH: Countering SIDH Attacks by Masking InformationTako Boris Fouotsa, Tomoki Moriya, Christophe PetitEUROCRYPT 2023 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Better Bounds for Finding Fixed-Degree Isogenies via Coppersmith's MethodMarius A. Aardal, Diego F. Aranha, Yansong Feng, Yiming Gao et al.EUROCRYPT 2026 · 2 citations
- Computing the Endomorphism Ring of a Supersingular Elliptic Curve from a Full Rank SuborderMingjie Chen, Christophe PetitEUROCRYPT 2025 · 2 citations
- The Supersingular Endomorphism Ring and One Endomorphism Problems are EquivalentAurel Page, Benjamin WesolowskiEUROCRYPT 2024 · 28 citations
- Orientations and the Supersingular Endomorphism Ring ProblemBenjamin WesolowskiEUROCRYPT 2022 · 34 citations
- Rational Isogenies from Irrational EndomorphismsWouter Castryck, Lorenz Panny, Frederik VercauterenEUROCRYPT 2020 · 47 citations
