Non-Singularity of the Gradient Descent Map for Neural Networks with Piecewise Analytic Activations
Alexandru Craciun, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
Abstract
The theory of training deep networks has become a central question of modern machine learning and has inspired many practical advancements. In particular, the gradient descent (GD) optimization algorithm has been extensively studied in recent years. A key assumption about GD has appeared in several recent works: the GD map is non-singular -- it preserves sets of measure zero under preimages. Crucially, this assumption has been used to prove that GD avoids saddle points and maxima, and to establish the existence of a computable quantity that determines the convergence to global minima (both for GD and stochastic GD). However, the current literature either assumes the non-singularity of the GD map or imposes restrictive assumptions, such as Lipschitz smoothness of the loss (for example, Lipschitzness does not hold for deep ReLU networks with the cross-entropy loss) and restricts the analysis to GD with small step-sizes. In this paper, we investigate the neural network map as a function on the space of weights and biases. We also prove, for the first time, the non-singularity of the gradient descent (GD) map on the loss landscape of realistic neural network architectures (with fully connected, convolutional, or softmax attention layers) and piecewise analytic activations (which includes sigmoid, ReLU, leaky ReLU, etc.) for almost all step-sizes. Our work significantly extends the existing results on the convergence of GD and SGD by guaranteeing that they apply to practical neural network settings and has the potential to unlock further exploration of learning dynamics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92154c2f-7913-44a9-b436-5c85d6d8807bBuilds on6
- Understanding the unstable convergence of gradient descentKwangjun Ahn, Jingzhao Zhang, Suvrit SraICML 2022 · 89 citations
- On Linear Stability of SGD and Input-Smoothness of Neural NetworksChao Ma, Lexing YingNeurIPS 2021 · 73 citations
- Some Fundamental Aspects about Lipschitz Continuity of Neural NetworksGrigory Khromov, Sidak Pal SinghICLR 2024 · 29 citations
- Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of StabilityJeremy Cohen, Simran Kaur, Yuanzhi Li, J. Zico Kolter et al.ICLR 2021 · 22 citations
- Special Properties of Gradient Descent with Large Learning RatesAmirkeivan Mohtashami, Martin Jaggi, Sebastian U. StichICML 2023 · 16 citations
Related papers
- A Mean Field Analysis Of Deep ResNet And Beyond: Towards Provably Optimization Via Overparameterization From DepthYiping Lu, Chao Ma, Yulong Lu, Jianfeng Lu et al.ICML 2020 · 85 citations
- On Learnability via Gradient Method for Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks in Teacher-Student SettingShunta Akiyama, Taiji SuzukiICML 2021 · 16 citations
- Continuous vs. Discrete Optimization of Deep Neural NetworksOmer Elkabetz, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputsEtienne Boursier, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2022 · 92 citations
- Landscape Connectivity and Dropout Stability of SGD Solutions for Over-parameterized Neural NetworksAlexander Shevchenko, Marco MondelliICML 2020 · 41 citations
