Lune

CHI2022Top-tier venue

Reflection in Theory and Reflection in Practice: An Exploration of the Gaps in Reflection Support among Personal Informatics Apps

Janghee Cho, Tian Xu, Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, Stephen Voida

2022Year
84Citations
27Top-tier citations

Abstract

Personal informatics (PI) systems have been developed to support reflection. While reflection is considered an indispensable activity in PI use, how and when reflection occurs is still under-studied. In this paper, we present an analysis of the interactive features of 123 commercial PI apps, revealing that reflective practices are unevenly supported. The lack of features that encourage user-driven reflection, scaffolding for setting goals and configuring data collection and presentation, and consideration of wider implications stand to limit meaning-making and frustrate nuanced insight generation based on lived experiences. Based on our findings, we discuss how reflection is currently misrepresented in personal informatics tools, identify and characterize the gaps between theoretical research on reflection and interface features in current apps, and offer suggestions about how reflection could be better supported.

• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 91f8172d-6de6-485d-b60c-10ba0bfb5bc6

Cited by top-tier papers27

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on12

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines