USENIX Security2024Top-tier venue
Lotto: Secure Participant Selection against Adversarial Servers in Federated Learning
Zhifeng Jiang, Peng Ye, Shiqi He, Wei Wang, Ruichuan Chen, Bo Li
Abstract
In Federated Learning (FL), common privacy-enhancing techniques, such as secure aggregation and distributed differential privacy, rely on the critical assumption of an honest majority among participants to withstand various attacks. In practice, however, servers are not always trusted, and an adversarial server can strategically select compromised clients to create a dishonest majority, thereby undermining the system's security guarantees. In this paper, we present Lotto, an FL system that addresses this fundamental, yet underexplored issue by providing secure participant selection against an adversarial server. Lotto supports two selection algorithms: random and informed. To ensure random selection without a trusted server, Lotto enables each client to autonomously determine their participation using verifiable randomness. For informed selection, which is more vulnerable to manipulation, Lotto approximates the algorithm by employing random selection within a refined client pool. Our theoretical analysis shows that Lotto effectively aligns the proportion of server-selected compromised participants with the base rate of dishonest clients in the population. Large-scale experiments further reveal that Lotto achieves time-to-accuracy performance comparable to that of insecure selection methods, indicating a low computational overhead for secure selection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 91e706d9-c39e-44a4-ba71-2cd2271d2d35Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
Related papers
- ELSA: Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Malicious ActorsMayank Rathee, Conghao Shen, Sameer Wagh, Raluca Ada PopaS&P 2023
- Towards Trustworthy Federated Learning with Untrusted ParticipantsYoussef Allouah, Rachid Guerraoui, John StephanICML 2025
- Input Integrity and Authentic Results: Towards Trustworthy Aggregation in Federated LearningZhangshuang Guan, Yulin Zhao, Zhiguo Wan, Wei WangINFOCOM 2025 · 1 citation
- Noise-Aware Algorithm for Heterogeneous Differentially Private Federated LearningSaber Malekmohammadi, Yaoliang Yu, Yang CaoICML 2024 · 10 citations
- FACT or Fiction: Can Truthful Mechanisms Eliminate Federated Free Riding?Marco Bornstein, Amrit Singh Bedi, Abdirisak Mohamed, Furong HuangNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
