"It's almost like Frankenstein": Investigating the Complexities of Scientific Collaboration and Privilege Management within Research Computing Infrastructures
Souradip Nath, Ananta Soneji, Jaejong Baek, Tiffany Bao, Adam Doupé, Carlos E. Rubio-Medrano, Gail-Joon Ahn
Abstract
Research Computing Infrastructures (RCIs) inte-grate high-performance computing, advanced data storage solutions, and sophisticated network protocols, connecting people, data, and computing resources to facilitate scientific collaboration in today's data-driven world. Access control is essential in such highly collaborative environments to prevent resource misutilization, safeguard data integrity, and allocate resources effectively, thereby enabling secure and trusted in-teractions among different users. However, unlocking the full potential of RCIs for collaborative research through effective access control requires more than technological exploration-it demands a deep, human-centered understanding of the stakeholders who operate and utilize these systems. In this paper, we present the first qualitative study that explores the human dimensions of RCI interactions, drawing insights from 24 key stakeholders, including researchers and system administrators, across 12 research institutions to ex-amine the collaborative practices, challenges, and needs with a focus on access control. Our findings reveal operational complexities and project-specific, trust-based resource-sharing dynamics, highlighting tensions between security and usability. Based on these insights, we provide stakeholder-driven rec-ommendations and requirements for adaptive, user-centered access control for RCIs, laying the groundwork for advancing human-centered security practices in RCIs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- Hackers vs. Testers: A Comparison of Software Vulnerability Discovery ProcessesDaniel Votipka, Rock Stevens, Elissa M. Redmiles, Jeremy Hu et al.S&P 2018 · 151 citations
- Matched and Mismatched SOCs: A Qualitative Study on Security Operations Center IssuesFaris Bugra Kokulu, Ananta Soneji, Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili et al.CCS 2019 · 134 citations
- Standardizing Reporting of Participant Compensation in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for the FieldJessica Pater, Amanda Coupe, Rachel Pfafman, Chanda Phelan et al.CHI 2021 · 52 citations
- "Flawed, but like democracy we don't have a better system": The Experts' Insights on the Peer Review Process of Evaluating Security PapersAnanta Soneji, Faris Bugra Kokulu, Carlos E. Rubio-Medrano, Tiffany Bao et al.S&P 2022 · 17 citations
- SoK: Social CybersecurityYuxi Wu, W. Keith Edwards, Sauvik DasS&P 2022 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Tensions between Access and Control in MakerspacesJacob Logas, Ruican Zhong, Stephanie Almeida, Sauvik DasCSCW 2020 · 3 citations
- Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is MadeOleksandra Vereschak, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCHI 2024 · 31 citations
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
- "Control Is a Trajectory, Not a Point": Conceptualizing Control in Human-AI Co-CreativityAlayt Issak, Jeba Rezwana, Casper HarteveldCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Privacy versus Transparency: Navigating Public Records Requests and Adversarial Dynamics in a Distributed Multi-Stakeholder CollaborationRachel E. Moran, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Emma S. Spiro, Kate StarbirdCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
