Self-CriTeach: LLM Self-Teaching and Self-Critiquing for Improving Robotic Planning via Automated Domain Generation
Jinbang Huang, Zhiyuan Li, Yuanzhao Hu, Zhanguang Zhang, Mark Coates, Xingyue Quan, Yingxue Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown strong promise for robotic task planning, particularly through automatic planning domain generation. However, prior approaches largely treat generated planning domains as planning utilities, which are brittle under imperfect logical states and perception noise, overlooking their potential as scalable sources of reasoning supervision and structured reward signals. At the same time, reasoning LLMs depend on chain-of-thought (CoT) supervision that is expensive to collect for robotic tasks, and reinforcement learning (RL) faces challenges on reward engineering. We propose Self-CriTeach, an LLM self-teaching and self-critiquing framework in which an LLM autonomously generates symbolic planning domains that serve a dual role: (i) enabling large-scale generation of robotic planning problem–plan pairs, and (ii) providing structured reward functions. First, the self-written domains enable large-scale generation of symbolic task plans, which are automatically transformed into extended CoT trajectories for supervised fine-tuning. Second, the self-written domains are reused as structured reward functions, providing dense feedback for reinforcement learning without manual reward engineering. This unified training pipeline yields a planning-enhanced LLM with higher planning success rates, stronger cross-task generalization, reduced inference cost, and resistance to imperfect logical states.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90ce5805-5af3-4c8a-bff7-26b48e6d91b4Builds on23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
Related papers
- Process Reward Models Meet Planning: Generating Precise and Scalable Datasets for Step-Level RewardsRaffaele Pisano, Roberto NavigliACL 2026 · 2 citations
- On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision MakingMartin Klissarov, R. Devon Hjelm, Alexander T. Toshev, Bogdan MazoureICLR 2025
- One Demo Is All It Takes: Planning Domain Derivation with LLMs from A Single DemonstrationJinbang Huang, Yixin Xiao, Zhanguang Zhang, Mark Coates et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Making VLMs More Robot-Friendly: Self-Critical Distillation of Low-Level Procedural ReasoningChan Young Park, Jillian Fisher, Marius Memmel, Dipika Khullar et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
