Estimating Privacy Leakage of Augmented Contextual Knowledge in Language Models
James Flemings, Bo Jiang, Wanrong Zhang, Zafar Takhirov, Murali Annavaram
Abstract
Language models (LMs) rely on their parametric knowledge augmented with relevant contextual knowledge for certain tasks, such as question answering. However, the contextual knowledge can contain private information that may be leaked when answering queries, and estimating this privacy leakage is not well understood. A straightforward approach of directly comparing an LM's output to the contexts can overestimate the privacy risk, since the LM's parametric knowledge might already contain the augmented contextual knowledge. To this end, we introduce context influence, a metric that builds on differential privacy, a widelyadopted privacy notion, to estimate the privacy leakage of contextual knowledge during decoding. Our approach effectively measures how each subset of the context influences an LM's response while separating the specific parametric knowledge of the LM. Using our context influence metric, we demonstrate that context privacy leakage occurs when contextual knowledge is out of distribution with respect to parametric knowledge. Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate how context influence properly attributes the privacy leakage to augmented contexts, and we evaluate how factors-such as model size, context size, generation position, etc.-affect context privacy leakage. The practical implications of our results will inform practitioners of the privacy risk associated with augmented contextual knowledge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
Related papers
- Analyzing Information Leakage of Updates to Natural Language ModelsSantiago Zanella-Béguelin, Lukas Wutschitz, Shruti Tople, Victor Rühle et al.CCS 2020 · 88 citations
- PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language ModelsHaoran Li, Dadi Guo, Donghao Li, Wei Fan et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity TheoryNiloofar Mireshghallah, Hyunwoo Kim, Xuhui Zhou, Yulia Tsvetkov et al.ICLR 2024 · 198 citations
- Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning for Large Language ModelsTong Wu, Ashwinee Panda, Jiachen T. Wang, Prateek MittalICLR 2024 · 58 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection LearnersYijia Xiao, Yiqiao Jin, Yushi Bai, Yue Wu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 18 citations
