Hierarchical Process Reward Models are Symbolic Vision Learners
Shan Zhang, Aotian Chen, Kai Zou, Jindong Gu, Yuan Xue, Anton van den Hengel
Abstract
Symbolic computer vision represents diagrams through explicit logical rules and structured representations, enabling interpretable understanding in machine vision. This requires fundamentally different learning paradigms from pixel-based visual models. Symbolic visual learners parse diagrams into geometric primitives-points, lines, and shapes-whereas pixel-based learners operate on textures and colors. We propose a novel self-supervised symbolic auto-encoder that encodes diagrams into structured primitives and their interrelationships within the latent space, and decodes them through our executable engine to reconstruct the input diagrams. Central to this architecture is SymHPR (Symbolic Hierarchical Process Reward Modeling), which applies hierarchical steplevel parsing rewards to enforce point-on-line, line-on-shape, and shape-on-relation consistency. Since vanilla reinforcement learning exhibits poor exploration in the policy space during diagram reconstruction; we thus introduce stabilization mechanisms to balance exploration and exploitation. We fine-tune our symbolic encoder on downstream tasks, developing a neuro-symbolic system that integrates the reasoning capabilities of neural networks with the interpretability of symbolic models through reasoning-grounded visual rewards. Evaluations across reconstruction, perception, and reasoning tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach: achieving a 98.2% reduction in MSE for geometric diagram reconstruction, surpassing GPT-4o by 0.6% with a 7B model on chart reconstruction, and improving by +13% on the MathGlance perception benchmark, and by +3% on MathVerse and GeoQA reasoning benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9075d1b8-ec2d-4c12-844b-273cb7879d3fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
Related papers
- End-to-End Neuro-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning with Textual ExplanationsLirui Luo, Guoxi Zhang, Hongming Xu, Yaodong Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Primitive Vision: Improving Diagram Understanding in MLLMsShan Zhang, Aotian Chen, Yanpeng Sun, Jindong Gu et al.ICML 2025
- A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry ProblemsMaizhen Ning, Qiu-Feng Wang, Kaizhu Huang, Xiaowei HuangACM MM 2023 · 18 citations
- SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic VerificationWenyao Cui, Huaping Zhang, Yongyi Huang, Qiuchi Li et al.KDD 2026
- Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs?Zeju Qiu, Weiyang Liu, Haiwen Feng, Zhen Liu et al.ICLR 2025
