Computationally Hard Problems Are Hard for QBF Proof Systems Too
Agnes Schleitzer, Olaf Beyersdorff
Abstract
There has been tremendous progress in the past decade in the field of quantified Boolean formulas (QBF), both in practical solving as well as in creating a theory of corresponding proof systems and their proof complexity analysis. Both for solving and for proof complexity, it is important to have interesting formula families on which we can test solvers and gauge the strength of the proof systems. There are currently few such formula families in the literature. We initiate a general programme on how to transform computationally hard problems (located in the polynomial hierarchy) into QBFs hard for the main QBF resolution systems Q-Res and QU-Res that relate to core QBF solvers. We illustrate this general approach on three problems from graph theory and logic. This yields QBF families that are provably hard for Q-Res and QU-Res (without any complexity assumptions).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on1
Related papers
- Runtime vs. Extracted Proof Size: An Exponential Gap for CDCL on QBFsOlaf Beyersdorff, Benjamin Böhm, Meena MahajanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Second-Order Quantified Boolean LogicJie-Hong R. JiangAAAI 2023 · 2 citations
- Solving Higher-Order Quantified Boolean Satisfiability via Higher-Order Model CheckingHiroshi Unno, Takeshi Tsukada, Jie-Hong Roland JiangAAAI 2025
- Interpolation-Based Semantic Gate Extraction and Its Applications to QBF PreprocessingFriedrich SlivovskyCAV 2020 · 10 citations
- Towards Practical Zero-Knowledge Proof for PSPACEAshwin Karthikeyan, Hengyu Liu, Kuldeep S. Meel, Ning LuoS&P 2026 · 4 citations
