Lune

ICLR2025Top-tier venue

Data-centric Prediction Explanation via Kernelized Stein Discrepancy

Mahtab Sarvmaili, Hassan Sajjad, Ga Wu

Abstract

Existing example-based prediction explanation methods often bridge test and training data points through the model's parameters or latent representations. While these methods offer clues to the causes of model predictions, they often exhibit innate shortcomings, such as incurring significant computational overhead or producing coarse-grained explanations. This paper presents a Highly-precise and Data-centric Explanation (HD-Explain) prediction explanation method that exploits properties of Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD). Specifically, the KSD uniquely defines a parameterized kernel function for a trained model that encodes model-dependent data correlation. By leveraging the kernel function, one can identify training samples that provide the best predictive support to a test point efficiently. We conducted thorough analyses and experiments across multiple classification domains, where we show that HD-Explain outperforms existing methods from various aspects, including 1) preciseness (fine-grained explanation), 2) consistency, and 3) computation efficiency, leading to a surprisingly simple, effective, and robust prediction explanation solution. Source code is available at https://github.com/MahtabSarvmaili/HDExplain .

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on11

  1. Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
  2. TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
  3. If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
  4. Scaling Up Influence FunctionsAndrea Schioppa, Polina Zablotskaia, David Vilar, Artem SokolovAAAI 2022 · 149 citations
  5. Data-Centric Explanations: Explaining Training Data of Machine Learning Systems to Promote TransparencyAriful Islam Anik, Andrea BuntCHI 2021 · 99 citations

Related papers

  1. Sliced Kernelized Stein DiscrepancyWenbo Gong, Yingzhen Li, José Miguel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2021 · 14 citations
  2. Active Slices for Sliced Stein DiscrepancyWenbo Gong, Kaibo Zhang, Yingzhen Li, José Miguel Hernández-LobatoICML 2021 · 8 citations
  3. A Kernelised Stein Statistic for Assessing Implicit Generative ModelsWenkai Xu, Gesine D. ReinertNeurIPS 2022 · 4 citations
  4. The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment ConvergenceNarayan Srinivasan, Matthew Sutton, Christopher C. Drovandi, Leah F. SouthICML 2025
  5. Learning Kernel Tests Without Data SplittingJonas M. Kübler, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Bernhard Schölkopf, Krikamol MuandetNeurIPS 2020 · 27 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines