OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Data
Shubham Toshniwal, Wei Du, Ivan Moshkov, Branislav Kisacanin, Alexan Ayrapetyan, Igor Gitman
Abstract
Mathematical reasoning continues to be a critical challenge in large language model (LLM) development with significant interest. However, most of the cutting-edge progress in mathematical reasoning with LLMs has become closed-source due to lack of access to training data. This lack of data access limits researchers from understanding the impact of different choices for synthesizing and utilizing the data. With the goal of creating a high-quality finetuning (SFT) dataset for math reasoning, we conduct careful ablation experiments on data synthesis using the recently released Llama3.1 family of models. Our experiments show that: (a) solution format matters, with excessively verbose solutions proving detrimental to SFT performance, (b) data generated by a strong teacher outperforms equally-sized data generated by a weak student model, (c) SFT is robust to low-quality solutions, allowing for imprecise data filtering, and (d) question diversity is crucial for achieving data scaling gains. Based on these insights, we create the OpenMathInstruct-2 dataset which consists of 14M question-solution pairs (≈ 600K unique questions), making it nearly eight times larger than the previous largest open-source math reasoning dataset. Finetuning the Llama-3.1-8B-Base using OpenMathInstruct-2 outperforms Llama3.1-8B-Instruct on MATH by an absolute 15.9% (51.9% → 67.8%). Finally, to accelerate the open-source efforts, we release the code, the finetuned models, and the OpenMathInstruct-2 dataset under a commercially permissive license.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8ffee4e3-35ac-4798-a9b0-72728e06cd8aCited by top-tier papers69
- Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth ApproachJonas Geiping, Sean McLeish, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 431 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
- OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning ModelsEtash Kumar Guha, Ryan Marten, Sedrick Keh, Negin Raoof et al.ICLR 2026 · 235 citations
- Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM ReasoningJaehun Jung, Seungju Han, Ximing Lu, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 50 citations
- TaskCraft: Automated Generation of Agentic TasksDingfeng Shi, Jingyi Cao, Qianben Chen, Weichen Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 49 citations
Builds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
Related papers
- MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical ReasoningZhengyang Tang, Xingxing Zhang, Benyou Wang, Furu WeiICML 2024 · 163 citations
- MuMath-Code: Combining Tool-Use Large Language Models with Multi-perspective Data Augmentation for Mathematical ReasoningShuo Yin, Weihao You, Zhilong Ji, Guoqiang Zhong et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- MuggleMath: Assessing the Impact of Query and Response Augmentation on Math ReasoningChengpeng Li, Zheng Yuan, Hongyi Yuan, Guanting Dong et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
- Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from ScratchYuyang Ding, Xinyu Shi, Xiaobo Liang, Juntao Li et al.ACL 2025
- MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical ReasoningKe Wang, Houxing Ren, Aojun Zhou, Zimu Lu et al.ICLR 2024 · 188 citations
