The Impact of Implicit and Explicit Feedback on Performance and Experience during VR-Supported Motor Rehabilitation
Negin Hamzeheinejad, Daniel Roth, Samantha Monty, Julian Breuer, Anuschka Rodenbergc, Marc Erich Latoschik
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of implicit and explicit feedback in Virtual Reality (VR) on performance and user experience during motor rehabilitation. In this work, explicit feedback consists of visual and auditory cues provided by a virtual trainer, compared to traditional feedback provided by a real physiotherapist. Implicit feedback was generated by the walking motion of the virtual trainer accompanying the patient during virtual walks. Here, the potential synchrony of movements between the trainer and trainee is intended to create an implicit visual affordance of motion adaption. We hypothesize that this will stimulate the activation of mirror neurons, thus fostering neuroadaptive processes. We conducted a clinical user study in a rehabilitation center employing a gait robot. We investigated the performance outcome and subjective experience of four resulting VR-supported rehabilitation conditions: with/without explicit feedback, and with/without implicit (synchronous motion) stimulation by a virtual trainer. We further included two baseline conditions reflecting the current NonVR procedure in the rehabilitation center. Our results show that additional feedback generally resulted in better patient performance, objectively assessed by the necessary applied support force of the robot. Additionally, our VR-supported rehabilitation procedure improved enjoyment and satisfaction, while no negative impacts could be observed. Implicit feedback and adapted motion synchrony by the virtual trainer led to higher mental demand, giving rise to hopes of increased neural activity and neuroadaptive stimulation.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 8ff169cb-2a1d-48e9-9111-2556520bad8cCited by top-tier papers2
- Breaking Plausibility Without Breaking Presence - Evidence For The Multi-Layer Nature Of PlausibilityLarissa Brübach, Franziska Westermeier, Carolin Wienrich, Marc Erich LatoschikIEEE VR 2022 · 30 citations
- Rhythms of Recovery: Patient-Centered Virtual Reality Exergame for Physical Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care UnitSangjun Eom, Tianyi Hu, Wenyi Xu, Liheng Zou et al.IEEE VR 2026
Related papers
- Multimodal Feedback to Make Real Walking in Virtual Reality More Accessible for People with and Without Mobility ImpairmentsM. Rasel Mahmud, Nafisa Anjum, Alberto Cordova, John QuarlesIEEE VR 2026
- Beyond Symmetry: A Novel Asymmetric Interaction Strategy for Immersive VR-Based Mirror TherapyTian Zhou, Lin Chen, Xiaocheng Wang, Zoe Xiao Fang et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Towards VR Training Adapted to Affective and Cognitive States: General Method and Evaluation of Mental WorkloadEmilie Hummel, Mélanie Cogné, Anatole Lécuyer, Marie Lange et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Virtual Reality Self Co-Embodiment: An Alternative to Mirror Therapy for Post-Stroke Upper Limb RehabilitationRodrigo Cerecero Curiel, Takuto Nakamura, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Takafumi Kanaya et al.IEEE VR 2024 · 11 citations
- From Preference to Performance: Patient-Centered Design of Multimodal Cueing in Parkinson's Disease Gait TrainingXinjin Li, Wenjie Wang, Kai Wang, Houzhen Tuo et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
