Deep Regression Representation Learning with Topology
Shihao Zhang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Angela Yao
Abstract
Most works studying representation learning focus only on classification and neglect regression. Yet, the learning objectives and, therefore, the representation topologies of the two tasks are fundamentally different: classification targets class separation, leading to disconnected representations, whereas regression requires ordinality with respect to the target, leading to continuous representations. We thus wonder how the effectiveness of a regression representation is influenced by its topology, with evaluation based on the Information Bottleneck (IB) principle. The IB principle is an important framework that provides principles for learning effective representations. We establish two connections between it and the topology of regression representations. The first connection reveals that a lower intrinsic dimension of the feature space implies a reduced complexity of the representation Z. This complexity can be quantified as the conditional entropy of Z on the target Y, and serves as an upper bound on the generalization error. The second connection suggests a feature space that is topologically similar to the target space will better align with the IB principle. Based on these two connections, we introduce PH-Reg, a regularizer specific to regression that matches the intrinsic dimension and topology of the feature space with the target space. Experiments on synthetic and real-world regression tasks demonstrate the benefits of PH-Reg. Code: https: //github.com/needylove/PH-Reg .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8fde7723-3424-4bd4-971f-e9d42b3bd697Cited by top-tier papers3
- Discretized Density-Guided Source-Free Adaptation for Continuous TargetsGezheng Xu, Qi CHEN, QIUHAO Zeng, Charles X. Ling et al.ICML 2026
- Improving Deep Regression with TightnessShihao Zhang, Yuguang Yan, Angela YaoICLR 2025
- Matching without Group Barrier for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationYuguang Yan, Haolin Yang, Shihao Zhang, Weilin Chen et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on11
- Delving into Deep Imbalanced RegressionYuzhe Yang, Kaiwen Zha, Ying-Cong Chen, Hao Wang et al.ICML 2021 · 385 citations
- Topological AutoencodersMichael Moor, Max Horn, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. BorgwardtICML 2020 · 192 citations
- Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated TextsEduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Daniil Cherniavskii et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 163 citations
- How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?Kenji Kawaguchi, Zhun Deng, Xu Ji, Jiaoyang HuangICML 2023 · 117 citations
- Intrinsic Dimension, Persistent Homology and Generalization in Neural NetworksTolga Birdal, Aaron Lou, Leonidas J. Guibas, Umut SimsekliNeurIPS 2021 · 94 citations
Related papers
- Improving Deep Regression with Ordinal EntropyShihao Zhang, Linlin Yang, Michael Bi Mi, Xiaoxu Zheng et al.ICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence Information Bottleneck for RegressionShujian Yu, Xi Yu, Sigurd Løkse, Robert Jenssen et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Representation Learning with Conditional Information Flow MaximizationDou Hu, Lingwei Wei, Wei Zhou, Songlin HuACL 2024
- Information Retention via Learning Supplemental FeaturesZhipeng Xie, Yahe LiICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- FlowNIB: An Information Bottleneck Analysis of Bidirectional vs. Unidirectional Language ModelsMd Kowsher, Nusrat Jahan Prottasha, Shiyun Xu, Shetu Mohanto et al.ICLR 2026
