Reference-guided Policy Optimization for Molecular Optimization via LLM Reasoning
Xuan Li, Zhanke Zhou, Zongze Li, Jiangchao Yao, Yu Rong, Lu Zhang, Bo Han
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) benefit substantially from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) in reasoning tasks. However, these recipes perform poorly in instruction-based molecular optimization, where each data point typically provides only a single optimized reference molecule and no step-by-step optimization trajectory. We reveal that answer-only SFT on the reference molecules collapses reasoning, and RLVR provides sparse feedback under similarity constraints due to the model's lack of effective exploration, which slows learning and limits optimization. To encourage the exploration of new molecules while balancing the exploitation of the reference molecules, we introduce Reference-guided Policy Optimization (RePO), an optimization approach that learns from reference molecules without requiring trajectory data. At each update, RePO samples candidate molecules with their intermediate reasoning trajectories from the model and trains the model using verifiable rewards that measure property satisfaction under similarity constraints in an RL manner. Meanwhile, it applies reference guidance by keeping the policy’s intermediate reasoning trajectory as context and training only the answer in a supervised manner. Together, the RL term promotes exploration, while the guidance term mitigates reward sparsity and stabilizes training by grounding outputs to references when many valid molecular edits exist. Across molecular optimization benchmarks, RePO consistently outperforms SFT and RLVR baselines (e.g., GRPO), achieving improvements on the optimization metric (Success Rate Similarity), improving balance across competing objectives, and generalizing better to unseen instruction styles. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/RePO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8fb896b2-55e1-46e7-97c6-b902279b9c04Builds on28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
Related papers
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim et al.ICML 2026
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
- R1-ShareVL: Incentivizing Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models via Share-GRPOHuanjin Yao, Qixiang Yin, Jingyi Zhang, Min Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM ReasoningXuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Dinghuai Zhang, Hengli Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 41 citations
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
