SDA: Steering-Driven Distribution Alignment for Open LLMs Without Fine-Tuning
Wei Xia, Zhi-Hong Deng
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), their deployment in real-world applications has become increasingly widespread. LLMs are expected to deliver robust performance across diverse tasks, user preferences, and practical scenarios. However, as demands grow, ensuring that LLMs produce responses aligned with human intent remains a foundational challenge. In particular, aligning model behavior effectively and efficiently during inference, without costly retraining or extensive supervision, is both a critical requirement and a non-trivial technical endeavor. To address the challenge, we propose SDA (Steering-Driven Distribution Alignment), a training-free and model-agnostic alignment framework designed for open-source LLMs. SDA dynamically redistributes model output probabilities based on user-defined alignment instructions, enhancing alignment between model behavior and human intents without fine-tuning. The method is lightweight, resource-efficient, and compatible with a wide range of open-source LLMs. It can function independently during inference or be integrated with training-based alignment strategies. Moreover, SDA supports personalized preference alignment, enabling flexible control over the model's response behavior. Empirical results demonstrate that SDA consistently improves alignment performance across 8 open-source LLMs with varying scales and diverse origins, evaluated on three key alignment dimensions, helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty (3H). Specifically, SDA achieves average gains of 64.4% in helpfulness, 30% in honesty and 11.5% in harmlessness across the tested models, indicating its effectiveness and generalization across diverse models and application scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/adventurexw/SDA .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8f5f91d0-4e31-41fb-a589-75fa0d1ba1cdBuilds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
Related papers
- Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language ModelsSomanshu Singla, Zhen Wang, Tianyang Liu, Abdullah Ashfaq et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Jailbreak Open-Sourced Large Language Models via Enforced DecodingHangfan Zhang, Zhimeng Guo, Huaisheng Zhu, Bochuan Cao et al.ACL 2024
- Reasoning over Precedents Alongside Statutes: Case-Augmented Deliberative Alignment for LLM SafetyCan Jin, Rui Wu, Tong Che, Qixin Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Mitigating Over-Refusal in Aligned Large Language Models via Inference-Time Activation EnergyEric Hanchen Jiang, Weixuan Ou, Run Liu, Shengyuan Pang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Code Red! On the Harmfulness of Applying Off-the-Shelf Large Language Models to Programming TasksAli Al-Kaswan, Sebastian Deatc, Begüm Koç, Arie van Deursen et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
